Re: 5D Mark III & Other Random Stuff
I don't know where you're getting this idea from. Big budget films use every focal length from super-tele to ultra-wide, including fisheye. That's part of what makes them so visually interesting. Fisheye and ultra-wides were used to great effect in Harry Potter films. In fact, I'm surprised that I would ever have to make this point.
Some professional photographers use almost exclusively 20 - 24 mm, and I listened to a talk by one fellow who believed anything over 35mm produced boring images.
Variety is welcomed, it is the lack of imagination or skill in the photographer/videographer that makes an ultra-wide look amateurish.
leGreve said:Etienne said:S P ... agreed. Ultra-wide is gaining popularity. Some of the hottest new lenses are UW. And UW is very useful in video.
You're talking indie right? Cause I would never look towards an ultra wide for anything serious or mainstream (money)... except the odd hip hop video now and again. It just looks... amateurish. But then again, it's all a cycle and I guess this generation will look towards the looks of the 90s :S eeek
I don't know where you're getting this idea from. Big budget films use every focal length from super-tele to ultra-wide, including fisheye. That's part of what makes them so visually interesting. Fisheye and ultra-wides were used to great effect in Harry Potter films. In fact, I'm surprised that I would ever have to make this point.
Some professional photographers use almost exclusively 20 - 24 mm, and I listened to a talk by one fellow who believed anything over 35mm produced boring images.
Variety is welcomed, it is the lack of imagination or skill in the photographer/videographer that makes an ultra-wide look amateurish.
Upvote
0