5Dmk3 doesnt play with kenko teleconverters
- Thread starter wickidwombat
- Start date
- Status
swampler said:
Can you confirm which ASIN number is on the TC that you have working. Do other lens work? Which AF point do you use ie, center, right of center, left of center, up from center. I have read that some focusing points work better then others.
I want to use 2x with future 5d Mark III with EC 300mm f74/l to gain the extra crop (length) for bird photography. I have used kendo 2x DGX with 7D and 300mm f/4 and worked great.
Thanks for your feedback.
Upvote
0
I have the 2X Teleplus Pro 300 DG. Also says C-AF and Made in Japan on it. Where do I find the ASIN number. I looked but don't see any serial number anywhere.Renato said:
I've only tried it on the 70-200. It seems to work with any focus points, but I was having issues with a few sequences being OOF, so I switched to center point, though truthfully, it was probably me missing the target or hitting the wrong rear button (still getting used to a dedicated AF-On button) as it happened again after switching.
Upvote
0
swampler said:
Marsu42 mentioned ASIN up above but I have not seen it either. I was hoping there was a way to find out which one works best.
B&H is also confusing because they call it in their web site Kenko Teleplus PRO 300 DG 2x AF Teleconverter; here they are missing the "X" in the DGX descriptor. Here is link http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/674567-REG/Kenko_PRO3002XDGXC_Teleplus_PRO_300_DG.html I contacted B&H and first the Photo Specialist said they did not have the DGX. Later I contated them by email explaining the situation and they said that it is the DGX which they have in stock. I will probalby order it and see if it works.
Upvote
0
The ASIN is only for Amazon, but you can convert it into country-specific the bar code number (EAN) that should be found on the box: http://erwinmayer.com/labs/asin2ean/index.phpRenato said:
The DGX is an updated DG version that reports changed exif data (aperture) to the lens. Afaik you can convert the DGX to the DG by taping three pins. But since it's "dumber" and has the same iq, the older DG might be a safer bet.swampler said:
Upvote
0
swampler said:
Sorry if I've spread wrong information, but this is what I've read when shopping for Kenko as the difference between dg and dgx - so I'm not the only one mistaken. After some more quick research, it seems the dgx reports the modified _focal_lenght_ better than the dg. And what's more, some say that only the dgx allows af with f8 while the dg does not - can you acknowledge this?
Upvote
0
I used 2X DGX from a friend with 7D + EF 300mm f/4L My 7D was able to focus at f/8 without problems; my test was very short so I dont know anything about AF speed but it focused acurately. I noticed that all the
photos I took the f-stop was reported f/4 on the photos and never changed regardles of light (I used Tv mode) but the ISO changed to adjust to different light.
I am interested to use it with future 5D MKIII to get extra reach since it is not a croped body..
photos I took the f-stop was reported f/4 on the photos and never changed regardles of light (I used Tv mode) but the ISO changed to adjust to different light.
I am interested to use it with future 5D MKIII to get extra reach since it is not a croped body..
Upvote
0
Renato said:
This is what I read, too and it's the reason I ordered it at all: The dgx betrays the camera into thinking it's not there, and thus the f8 af works because the camera doesn't recognize it as f8... I'll report back once I've got mine, could take a bit because it's mail order.
Upvote
0
Now I'm really confused. I had never tried using the 2x on an f/4 lens before, so at your request, I pulled out the 2X and my 24-105 f/4 L and put them on the Mark 3. Low and behold, it let me turn the aperture down to f/4 instead of maxing it out at f/8??? I did try a bit of AF and it seemed to work, just not really fast (I'm sitting in a semi-dark room, so probably work OK outside). Seemed to work better at the longer focal lengths as well. Now, after reading your post about thinking the DG does not report aperture, I put my 70-200 f/2.8L back on the camera with the TC and sure enough, it wouldn't go over f/5.6. So maybe it has "smart" electronics in it to allow it to AF at f/8 by not reporting the aperture, while also allowing it to report the correct aperture with a lens that's fast enough to support it?Marsu42 said:
Weird results, but hope it helps you.
Upvote
0
swampler said:
YESSS! That is good! I dont need to wait for 7D MII. Just use 5D MKII with Kenko 1.4 or 2x to get the crop, and since ISO noise is very low I expect to get good photos... But wait, still dont know how fast will it focus for something like bird in flight! I will report on these issues when I get my 5D ank Kenko.
Upvote
0
Marsu42 said:
I ordered and received one using your link above and it works great with my 5D Mk III.
Upvote
0
Renato said:
Okay, I just tested it successfully with my 90mm TS-E, 24-105, 70-200 f/2.8 IS II, 400mm f/2.8 II, and Sigma 85mm f/1.4
Upvote
0
I just did a quick experiment using my Kenko 1.4X Teleplus Pro 300 and my 70-300 f/4-5.6L IS USM lens set on Av priority at 5.6 which was the most open I could go with the convertor on with the lens at 300mm. These shots were taken hand held and with Auto ISO. The first is an attempt at autofocus. The lens kept searching and occasionally signaled that AF was reached. The first picture gave an signal that focus was reached but the indicator in the view finder flicked off but there was not change in the image in the VF. Here is that shot:
Here's a shot that was manually focused. I think it looks a little sharper to my eye:
So with my little test, it looks as if the Kenko failed. It really struggled to lock on ??maybe a firmware update would corrected this??? I am not quite sure how. Also, the fact that it was hand held and not on a tripod and with either mirror lock or 2 second delay to avoid camera shake could admittedly have factored in. However, the search to lock on, to me, indicated that with the Kenko there was an issue. Without the Kenko, it locked on and held the confirmation light in the VF immediately.
Here's a shot that was manually focused. I think it looks a little sharper to my eye:
So with my little test, it looks as if the Kenko failed. It really struggled to lock on ??maybe a firmware update would corrected this??? I am not quite sure how. Also, the fact that it was hand held and not on a tripod and with either mirror lock or 2 second delay to avoid camera shake could admittedly have factored in. However, the search to lock on, to me, indicated that with the Kenko there was an issue. Without the Kenko, it locked on and held the confirmation light in the VF immediately.
Upvote
0
The top image has sharp focus on the back rim of the glass. The bottom image has a lot of shake and looks worse. I don't think this was a representative test.
I believe the discussion of whether or not they worked was more absolute than focus accuracy. I think for some people, the combination flat doesn't work. Also, it's worth noting that the instructions say to mount the extender on the lens first and then put the combination on the body. While switching through the lenses I tested, I was just removing the lens from the extender while leaving it attached to the body. While the lens was off and the extender was still on the body, the camera's red light would blink even though the power was off. So, it's probably best to follow the instructions and mount the extender to the lens first.
I believe the discussion of whether or not they worked was more absolute than focus accuracy. I think for some people, the combination flat doesn't work. Also, it's worth noting that the instructions say to mount the extender on the lens first and then put the combination on the body. While switching through the lenses I tested, I was just removing the lens from the extender while leaving it attached to the body. While the lens was off and the extender was still on the body, the camera's red light would blink even though the power was off. So, it's probably best to follow the instructions and mount the extender to the lens first.
Upvote
0
Here's a sequence I did with my new 5D Mark III recently at Red Rocks Park, west of Denver. I use a hilltop radio tower and facility as a good lens testing target as it has lots of thin wires etc good for resolution testing. These were all on a tripod, but center spot auto-focus was used, no manual focus, and the auto-focusing seemed to be on the money and pretty quick, but admittedly it was a nice bright sunny day.
The first for reference is using the kit lens at 105mm, then the second is with my 70-300L @ 300mm, then the third with that lens with the Kenko 1.4X, making it 420 mm. I downsized these quite a bit for posting, but at full size, raw (especially with the new fixed DPP), these are pretty darn sharp.
I reached the total attachment file size limit with these three, but I will post a follow-up with a 100% crop of the 420 mm shot. Comparing it back to the 105 mm image (which itself is already a ~ 2X magnification vs reality) I think the reach and image quality the Kenko is providing is quite good. Now if we could just figure out how to get it to work with some of the other lenses it doesn't want to play with, I'd be totally happy with it.
The first for reference is using the kit lens at 105mm, then the second is with my 70-300L @ 300mm, then the third with that lens with the Kenko 1.4X, making it 420 mm. I downsized these quite a bit for posting, but at full size, raw (especially with the new fixed DPP), these are pretty darn sharp.
I reached the total attachment file size limit with these three, but I will post a follow-up with a 100% crop of the 420 mm shot. Comparing it back to the 105 mm image (which itself is already a ~ 2X magnification vs reality) I think the reach and image quality the Kenko is providing is quite good. Now if we could just figure out how to get it to work with some of the other lenses it doesn't want to play with, I'd be totally happy with it.
Attachments
Upvote
0
- Status
Similar threads
