• The Canon Rumors Forum has officially been shut down as of July 10, 2026.

    All data will be deleted on September 16, 2026.

    the ad free experience will return by July 17, 2026.

5Dmk4 vs A6300 vs X-T2 vs GX85 (GH4) 4K Detail & Lowlight Comparison

Aug 11, 2016
46
0
4,881
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3n7Qvu1KMt8
:-\

jv6xdf.jpg
 
One of the reasons for my buying a 5DIV was that my 5Ds R occasionally gives Moire when
I am so close to birds that the feather barbs give some Moire. It's only happened a couple of times in 20,000. But, the incredibly sharp 400mm DO doesn't blur enough. Otherwise, the 5Ds R is stunning in terms of sharpness.
 
Upvote 0
I know nothing much about video, so apologies if this is a stupid question, but surely the AA filter works on too low a level to show up in video as softness? Given that video is already downsampled, or whatever the correct term is? Even 4K?

Like, if you took a photo with the 5Ds and the 5DsR, and downsampled them both to 4K resolution, any difference in 1:1 sharpness in the original images would be swamped by the reduction in output size? Am I missing something?
 
Upvote 0
scyrene said:
I know nothing much about video, so apologies if this is a stupid question, but surely the AA filter works on too low a level to show up in video as softness? Given that video is already downsampled, or whatever the correct term is? Even 4K?

Like, if you took a photo with the 5Ds and the 5DsR, and downsampled them both to 4K resolution, any difference in 1:1 sharpness in the original images would be swamped by the reduction in output size? Am I missing something?

4K from the 5D IV isn't being downsampled. It's a 4096*2160 crop of the centre of the sensor, which is why some people are unhappy about the crop factor.
 
Upvote 0
davidj said:
scyrene said:
I know nothing much about video, so apologies if this is a stupid question, but surely the AA filter works on too low a level to show up in video as softness? Given that video is already downsampled, or whatever the correct term is? Even 4K?

Like, if you took a photo with the 5Ds and the 5DsR, and downsampled them both to 4K resolution, any difference in 1:1 sharpness in the original images would be swamped by the reduction in output size? Am I missing something?

4K from the 5D IV isn't being downsampled. It's a 4096*2160 crop of the centre of the sensor, which is why some people are unhappy about the crop factor.

Is that right? I thought it was a roughly 1.6x crop. 4096x2160=8.8MP. The 5D4's sensor is 30MP. Crop factor is a linear measure, right? So is the calculation not roughly ((√30MP)/1.6)²? Which is over 11MP. I'm not great at maths though :-\
 
Upvote 0
I'm beginning to think that there is something in the setup that was missed. I find it really hard to believe the image can be that soft. Also, it could be a software issue between Canon files and editing software.
So many sample videos at 720P that's it's hard to really tell.
 
Upvote 0
How about using a canon lens with this camera?
After all people shooting a 5d m4 are probably going to use canon L glass or eqivalent

We all know glass is king, so pair up a kingly lens to the kingly camera for a proper comparison
 
Upvote 0
njene said:
How about using a canon lens with this camera?
After all people shooting a 5d m4 are probably going to use canon L glass or eqivalent

We all know glass is king, so pair up a kingly lens to the kingly camera for a proper comparison
He is testing the 4k movie quality rather than len quality, that's why same sigma APSC len is used.
 
Upvote 0
Hi,
I think he should double check his settings or try using an EF lens to verified the result again.

Anyway, if I were a reviewer and I found some big issue with a high profile camera, I'll make sure I done all I can to verified the result include getting a 2nd unit or use other lens on it before I post the result... credibility is very importance and once lost, it hard to gain back.

Have a nice day.
 
Upvote 0
raptor3x said:
scyrene said:
Is that right? I thought it was a roughly 1.6x crop. 4096x2160=8.8MP. The 5D4's sensor is 30MP. Crop factor is a linear measure, right? So is the calculation not roughly ((√30MP)/1.6)²? Which is over 11MP. I'm not great at maths though :-\

You also have to take the aspect ratio difference into account, hence the 1.76x crop.

Ooh of course. I knew there was something I was missing!
 
Upvote 0
pokerz said:
njene said:
How about using a canon lens with this camera?
After all people shooting a 5d m4 are probably going to use canon L glass or eqivalent

We all know glass is king, so pair up a kingly lens to the kingly camera for a proper comparison
He is testing the 4k movie quality rather than len quality, that's why same sigma APSC len is used.

This is where I had concerns...since the 5D mark IV doesn't downsample the entire sensor...it seems to me like individual pixel sharpness would matter to a much greater degree than on competing cameras. If you get one pixel of blur on the 5D Mark IV that would show up...if you got it on a competing camera, it would potentially be masked out by the downsampling routine.

I don't know why Canon doesn't downsample and I'm not video expert...but it does bring into question if that's the best lens to use on the 5D.
 
Upvote 0
pokerz said:
njene said:
How about using a canon lens with this camera?
After all people shooting a 5d m4 are probably going to use canon L glass or eqivalent

We all know glass is king, so pair up a kingly lens to the kingly camera for a proper comparison
He is testing the 4k movie quality rather than len quality, that's why same sigma APSC len is used.

Doesnt matter what hes testing - the lens used makes a difference
The test method is flawed
See also: http://www.canonrumors.com/eos-5d-mark-iv-compatibility-warning-from-sigma/
 
Upvote 0
I went chasing Golden Eagles in the mountains yesterday. There was a young eagle hovering nearby. Then suddenly I saw a buzzard starting to skydive. The following 4 pics were taken at a distance of approx. 200 m just in the original size (just a 100% crop of 600x400 pixels - just to say, how small the bird on the original photo is! ;) ). I think it is still amazing to see how the skydive begins. And last two shots of the eagle as well. I am not sure about the last picture. Looks like the eagle has swallowed a ball... :) Maybe these are the remainings of a groundhog.
 

Attachments

  • 911_2550s.jpg
    911_2550s.jpg
    136.7 KB · Views: 785
  • 911_2553s.jpg
    911_2553s.jpg
    134 KB · Views: 795
  • 911_2556s.jpg
    911_2556s.jpg
    134.8 KB · Views: 792
  • 911_2558s.jpg
    911_2558s.jpg
    135.1 KB · Views: 782
  • 911_2273s.jpg
    911_2273s.jpg
    433.8 KB · Views: 162
  • 911_2297s.jpg
    911_2297s.jpg
    465.9 KB · Views: 174
Upvote 0