5DMKIII ISO

I regularly shoot at 3200 in clubs, etc., with good results. What noise there is (and there's not a lot) is easily taken care of in LR. I've occasionally ventured into 6400 and definitely noticed the noise increase in the shadows, but NR and dropping the blacks a bit (which in most cases is what I want for these situations) worked out well.

I'd take a few quick test shots in the event space at something like 3200 | f8 | 1/125, look at the histogram, and if needed, decide which point of the exposure triangle you can sacrifice. Is noise, DoF, or freezing motion more important? Good luck!

One last point: I've been fixated on (lack of) noise forever and have decided to experiment with 12800 and 25600 at a (non-paying) gig I'm shooting tomorrow night, just to see if there's room for noise somewhere in my photographic life.
 
Upvote 0
tog13 said:
I regularly shoot at 3200 in clubs, etc., with good results. What noise there is (and there's not a lot) is easily taken care of in LR. I've occasionally ventured into 6400 and definitely noticed the noise increase in the shadows, but NR and dropping the blacks a bit (which in most cases is what I want for these situations) worked out well.

I'd take a few quick test shots in the event space at something like 3200 | f8 | 1/125, look at the histogram, and if needed, decide which point of the exposure triangle you can sacrifice. Is noise, DoF, or freezing motion more important? Good luck!

One last point: I've been fixated on (lack of) noise forever and have decided to experiment with 12800 and 25600 at a (non-paying) gig I'm shooting tomorrow night, just to see if there's room for noise somewhere in my photographic life.

Thanks for the response. This will be a paying gig and i want to deliver the sharpest best quality photos possible.
 
Upvote 0
Deliver how...full res digital files? 8x10" prints? The degree of enlargement affects how noise is perceived. Also, a lot depends on your NR method(s) in your RAW conversion workflow. Topaz DeNoise is excellent, DxO's new Optics Pro 9 with their PRIME algorithm is even better (but takes several minutes per image, so might not be ideal if you need to turn a large set of images around quickly).
 
Upvote 0
neuroanatomist said:
Deliver how...full res digital files? 8x10" prints? The degree of enlargement affects how noise is perceived. Also, a lot depends on your NR method(s) in your RAW conversion workflow. Topaz DeNoise is excellent, DxO's new Optics Pro 9 with their PRIME algorithm is even better (but takes several minutes per image, so might not be ideal if you need to turn a large set of images around quickly).

The client wont receive digital files. They will order prints.
 
Upvote 0