6D owners, are you upgrading?

[Khalai]

Upgraded from 6d to 5dmk3 about three years ago. Sold the 5d3 a few months ago anticipating 6dmk2. My expectations were a sub$2000 full frame with an updated sensor with dual pixel, touch screen, massively improved AF over mk1, weather sealing. With all the negative news about the new sensor, I'm glad I moved on to fuji. 6dmk2 will still be on my wist list but I am not paying full price for sure. In fact I just ordered sony a7rii with metabone adaptor just to try it out. I really hate leaving canon but apparently I am starting to feel silly for being loyal. In the mean time a Sony body with canon lenses is a viable compromise.

That's four bodies north of $1k / three bodies north of $2k in 5 years from 3 different brands.

I really hope you find what you are looking for, but I'd consider renting before buying to save a few bucks!

- A

Over time, I've rented Sony A72, Fuji XPro2 and XT2, Nikon D610 and D750. And eventually always came back to Canon. While I really despise the decision of worse sensor of 6D II that other current Canon cameras, I'm apparently unable to part with Canon excellent glass, ergonomics are spot-on and since I shoot usually on ISO 400-3200, DR is less of an issue for me, because after 400-800 ISO, any advantage of ABC cameras are practically gone.

What bothers me most is that Canon apparently can, but they won't. So unless there is an irresistible price offering for 6D II, I'm staying with my trusty old 6D...

 

[dak723]

I sold my 6D because it was just too big and heavy. If the 6D II had become a "small" FF (similar to how the SL1 is a small crop), then I would definitely have considered it. The original 6D has excellent IQ, so, based on the info we have - that the IQ is the same with perhaps an increase in the ability to lift shadows cleanly - then I would have gotten one had it been smaller.

DR is absolutely not an issue for me since the original 6D has more than enough for everything I ever shot with it. As I mentioned, the 6D has excellent IQ, so the 6D II will too.

 

[Cory]

Already upgraded - to the 6D I; and it's glorious.

 

[tcmatthews]

I sold my 6D a year ago in anticipation of the 6D II. I decided that my Sony A7II worked well enough that the 6D was redundant. I had just bought a Canon 7D II for wildlife so the 6D was not seeing much use. The A7II had a wider array of focus point than the 6D, and a faster shutter. Given the lackluster features I am trying to decide if I should just sell my 7DII which I hate carrying around because it is huge and buying a 80D or sell all my Canon stuff over time and move on to to the Sony G-master lenses.

In general I am taking a wait and see. Approach, with a camera buying freeze. Partially because I have other things I want to buy and the cameras releases have been snooze worthly.

Regardless I do not think there are any new Canon Cameras in my future. If I buy it is going to be a refurb if I buy anything.

 

[cpsico]

Not likely! the original 6d was a sensor upgrade to the 5dIII. Unless they can add 4K video with a firmware upgrade this camera fails to find a market niche. Original 6d offered great image quality second to none in the canon lineup. For everyday use it was my go to camera, it was versatile, small and I didn't sacrifice IQ when I didn't need a big camera. Maybe when it drops to under 1500 and my original 6d has died just maybe.

 

[timmy_650]

I was thinking about selling some of my lenses and my 6D so I could get the mark 2 but now. I think I will stay put with my 6D. I shoot a lot of landscapes, so a better AF would be nice but not needed. I think I will wait and maybe in a year Canon will have another goof sale where you can stack coupons. Where I can get it for $1000, then sale my 6D for $700-800.
Well I have also been really thinking about a small form factor camera. Maybe I will go with a M5 or something like that.

 

[dlee13]

I sold my 6D prior to the announcement and still plan on getting the 6D2. I am bothered by the results I've seen so far and I welcome the upgrade to the AF and screen. Honestly I'm really excited and can't wait till and I can finally pick it up next week The only area that limited me with the 6D was the AF, now that it's been improved it will be perfect for me!

 

[drob]

I started to save up for the 6DMk2 but @ 2K I'd expect a sensor improvement. The camera features and AF are vastly improved but not worth $2000. The price will have to drop to at least 1500 in order for me to buy this camera. Or might as well go for the 5DMk4. I'd love to know Canon's decision making process for the sensor.

 

[xps]

Still looking for an 2nd FF body. Thought the 6DII would be "more" like the 6D - better IQ/DR/lesser noise as 5D series with slower AF. I´m very pleased about my 5DIV. I had too high expectations on the MKII version of the 6D.
The best will be, renting one for 1-2 days and see, how the MkII performs in my hands.
Maybe all the complaints are just "hot air" - like the AF perfomance of the original 6D. The 6D made a lot supersharp shots of fast moving objects...

 

[nc0b]

I am perfectly happy with my 6D Mk I in general, and particularly in low light. Indoor shots at ISO 12,800 are amazing. It is a nice companion to my 5DsR. I generally use center point focusing on both bodies, BIF, general wildlife, whatever. If I really need a flippy LCD I can use my 60D. I shoot no video, so the limitations of any of my bodies in that respect are non-issues.

 

[Valvebounce]

Hi rfdesigner.
I don't own a 6D but want something to click ;D ;D ;D genius, had me chuckling like an idiot, at least that's what Angela said!

Cheers, Graham.

 

[GaryUK]

Been lurking here for years, so thought it time I registered.

In the light of the sensor news no.. Ironically, this would have been the first time I'd have been an early adopter. I bought a 20D in '05; a 7D in '10 and my 6D in 2013. But I feel as if they have taken us all for granted, so concur with the don't buy it brigade.

My last major purchase was swapping my 300mm for the 100-400 II. I liked the idea of f8 focus on a 6D2; but to have got the best out of it, I'd have also needed to upgrade my Mk1 1.4x converter. So for the sports and wildlife, I might swap my aging 7D for an 80D.

Perhaps a 6D3 will come along a bit quicker. After all, it will probably only be a few months before the 6D2's sensor and lack of 4K looks laughable, as the competition marches on.

Mirrorless cameras have come on nicely, from the XT-2 to the Sony A series. I can see the day when I will buy one, an A7iii perhaps ? Maybe though, Canon will surprise us with a mirrorless effort that takes Ef or Ef-s lenses directly? If not, I can see many people, myself included gradually migrating away.

 

[jd7]

My 6D is already well used and I was hoping for decent upgrade. While 6D Mk.II will be a good camera, I just don't see the upgrade I expected for 2000 GBP. And I'm even not interested in video at all. 5D Mk.IV looks better every day, but that will require much more saving.

Maybe after my initial shock with sensor and AF module goes away or after my Mk.I dies, I will think differently. Hopefully price will drop by that time.

That about sums up my thinking too. I was expecting to want a 6D mk II but at this point I'm not so sure. I will read the reviews which come out over the next weeks with interest, but given the sensor hasn't been brought in line with the 5DIV (which I had felt sure it would, apart from resolution of course), at this point in time I'm struggling with the idea of handing over that much cash for a 6DII. I'd certainly like the better AF system and higher FPS, but personally things like the flip out screen don't excite me, so from my point of view it seems I'd be paying a significant amount of money for that AF and the FPS jump.

What I've read so far about the 6DII has even made me consider looking for a used 5DIII (I'd much prefer the joystick and button layout, although I prefer the weight and size of the 6D series) or possibly going for a 5DIV (although that is more money than I had in mind to spend on what is really just a toy for me). Anyway, my 6D is still doing fine so I'll sit tight for now.

Edit: I don't mean to suggest the AF and FPS jump is not significant. It is, of course. It's just that for the money I would have liked to think we'd get the latest sensor tech. As it seems that's not the case, it's an issue I will think harder about now.

 

[candyman]

I seem to be one of the few that is going to upgrade my 6D to a 6D MK II. I pre-ordered it and got a message that it will arrive next week Thursday. Call me stupid
I bought the 6D as a second camera next to my 5D MK III. I use the 5D MK III (with battery grip) mainly for bird /BIF and wildlife photography. I don’t upgrade to the 5D MK IV because the price is ridiculous high: €4129. The price does not seem to go down. (I bought the 5D MK III as a new camera in October 2012 for €2949)
I bought the 6D because it is a fullframe camera in a smaller and lighter body compared to the 5D MK III. This was a major reason to buy it. I use the 6D mainly for landscape (with LEE filters) and city photography. Smaller and lighter is good while travelling. I have some nice L-lenses and I love the image quality of the lenses. So I don’t want to give up on Canon glass. The 6D MK II is an interesting upgrade for ME. It is still small and light. It offers the vari-angle screen. That is something I really look forward for landscape and city photography. But also the increasement of fps (and the f8 for 27 AF points using my 100-400II and ext. MK III) for this camera is very interesting. When I am out in the landscape I may run into a wildlife or bird/BIF situation. Now I can handle this with the 6D MK II even better than before. I don’t need to think of bringing the 5D MKIII along and thus travel with only one light camera.
Like many I was hoping for sensor improvement. However, I am not sure how much difference it will make for ME. Sure I raised shadows now and then but not so much. I don’t believe I will suffer from the 6D MK II sensor. I keep in mind that it is Canon’s entry level full frame and I do not expect the 5D class features. Yes, the 6D sensor matched/exceeded the 5D MK III sensor. So we were lucky. The 6D MK II brings enough for ME to upgrade and I am sure I will do some nice photos with it.
And price? Yes, it does not come cheap. But I believe, seeing the price development (not moving at all!) of the 5D MK IV, the price of the 6D MK II will stay at this new price (€2129) some time as well.
Those are my 2cents thoughts

 

[rfdesigner]

I seem to be one of the few that is going to upgrade my 6D to a 6D MK II.

Sounds like a good buy for you.. giving you the upgrades in the areas you need.

I think we'll all be interested in your opinion of it once you've had it in your hands for a month.

 

[Khalai]

I seem to be one of the few that is going to upgrade my 6D to a 6D MK II. I pre-ordered it and got a message that it will arrive next week Thursday. Call me stupid
I bought the 6D as a second camera next to my 5D MK III. I use the 5D MK III (with battery grip) mainly for bird /BIF and wildlife photography. I don’t upgrade to the 5D MK IV because the price is ridiculous high: €4129. The price does not seem to go down. (I bought the 5D MK III as a new camera in October 2012 for €2949)
I bought the 6D because it is a fullframe camera in a smaller and lighter body compared to the 5D MK III. This was a major reason to buy it. I use the 6D mainly for landscape (with LEE filters) and city photography. Smaller and lighter is good while travelling. I have some nice L-lenses and I love the image quality of the lenses. So I don’t want to give up on Canon glass. The 6D MK II is an interesting upgrade for ME. It is still small and light. It offers the vari-angle screen. That is something I really look forward for landscape and city photography. But also the increasement of fps (and the f8 for 27 AF points using my 100-400II and ext. MK III) for this camera is very interesting. When I am out in the landscape I may run into a wildlife or bird/BIF situation. Now I can handle this with the 6D MK II even better than before. I don’t need to think of bringing the 5D MKIII along and thus travel with only one light camera.
Like many I was hoping for sensor improvement. However, I am not sure how much difference it will make for ME. Sure I raised shadows now and then but not so much. I don’t believe I will suffer from the 6D MK II sensor. I keep in mind that it is Canon’s entry level full frame and I do not expect the 5D class features. Yes, the 6D sensor matched/exceeded the 5D MK III sensor. So we were lucky. The 6D MK II brings enough for ME to upgrade and I am sure I will do some nice photos with it.
And price? Yes, it does not come cheap. But I believe, seeing the price development (not moving at all!) of the 5D MK IV, the price of the 6D MK II will stay at this new price (€2129) some time as well.
Those are my 2cents thoughts

I guess for wildlife and BIF you won't usually use lowest ISO possible right? Because from ISO 400 upwards, any DR disadvantage of 6D II is virtually gone.

I'm still trying to like 6D II, but it seems that I can't get over that bad aftertaste that Canon could deliver better DR, but they decided not to. That leaves me rather disappointed.

 

[LesC]

I bought the original 6D as it was the smallest and cheapest FF body that Canon make & it produces excellent noise-free images in any conditions I shoot in.

The 6D MKII will do the same & has other improvements that appeal to me like articulating screen, improved AF, larger sensor etc.

I don't need/want the extra expense/weight of the 5D MKIV so the MKII will be perfect for me.

 

[candyman]

I seem to be one of the few that is going to upgrade my 6D to a 6D MK II.

Sounds like a good buy for you.. giving you the upgrades in the areas you need.

I think we'll all be interested in your opinion of it once you've had it in your hands for a month.

I will share my experiences

 

[candyman]

I seem to be one of the few that is going to upgrade my 6D to a 6D MK II. I pre-ordered it and got a message that it will arrive next week Thursday. Call me stupid
I bought the 6D as a second camera next to my 5D MK III. I use the 5D MK III (with battery grip) mainly for bird /BIF and wildlife photography. I don’t upgrade to the 5D MK IV because the price is ridiculous high: €4129. The price does not seem to go down. (I bought the 5D MK III as a new camera in October 2012 for €2949)
I bought the 6D because it is a fullframe camera in a smaller and lighter body compared to the 5D MK III. This was a major reason to buy it. I use the 6D mainly for landscape (with LEE filters) and city photography. Smaller and lighter is good while travelling. I have some nice L-lenses and I love the image quality of the lenses. So I don’t want to give up on Canon glass. The 6D MK II is an interesting upgrade for ME. It is still small and light. It offers the vari-angle screen. That is something I really look forward for landscape and city photography. But also the increasement of fps (and the f8 for 27 AF points using my 100-400II and ext. MK III) for this camera is very interesting. When I am out in the landscape I may run into a wildlife or bird/BIF situation. Now I can handle this with the 6D MK II even better than before. I don’t need to think of bringing the 5D MKIII along and thus travel with only one light camera.
Like many I was hoping for sensor improvement. However, I am not sure how much difference it will make for ME. Sure I raised shadows now and then but not so much. I don’t believe I will suffer from the 6D MK II sensor. I keep in mind that it is Canon’s entry level full frame and I do not expect the 5D class features. Yes, the 6D sensor matched/exceeded the 5D MK III sensor. So we were lucky. The 6D MK II brings enough for ME to upgrade and I am sure I will do some nice photos with it.
And price? Yes, it does not come cheap. But I believe, seeing the price development (not moving at all!) of the 5D MK IV, the price of the 6D MK II will stay at this new price (€2129) some time as well.
Those are my 2cents thoughts

I guess for wildlife and BIF you won't usually use lowest ISO possible right? Because from ISO 400 upwards, any DR disadvantage of 6D II is virtually gone.

I'm still trying to like 6D II, but it seems that I can't get over that bad aftertaste that Canon could deliver better DR, but they decided not to. That leaves me rather disappointed.

Well....for landscape I stay on ISO 100. For birdphotography I want to stay between ISO 100 and 640...but...that only happens on sunny days. And I live in a place that has more cloudy and rainy days
So you're right with higher ISO the DR disadvantage is less/gone. But the main use is landscape/city on ISO 100. I don't have enough imagination to translate the DR examples here on the NET and the real situations I face to value the disadvantage. Yes, Canon could deliver better but choose to focus on other features for this upgrade on their entry level. For ME that is okay. Time and the experience will tell me.

 

[Khalai]

Well....for landscape I stay on ISO 100. For birdphotography I want to stay between ISO 100 and 640...but...that only happens on sunny days. And I live in a place that has more cloudy and rainy days
So you're right with higher ISO the DR disadvantage is less/gone. But the main use is landscape/city on ISO 100. I don't have enough imagination to translate the DR examples here on the NET and the real situations I face to value the disadvantage. Yes, Canon could deliver better but choose to focus on other features for this upgrade on their entry level. For ME that is okay. Time and the experience will tell me.

Don't get me wrong. I've managed to get satisfying landscape images from my 6D. GNDs and exposure blending helps a ton. The original 6D was praised for its IQ back then. Thing is, that five years later, there is not much apparent improvement, while its peers are evolving. THAT's what bugs me.

But I'm apparently not a target customer. 6D's AF does not limit me (much), sviweling touch screen with DPAF seems really nice, but not 2100€ nice, so there is not much incentive for me to upgrade. But if there were major improvement in sensor like e.g. in 5D IV, I would have had much difficult (and pleasing) decision to make...