I have the F4 non IS version and I've gotten quit a few good shots with it with my T1i, but I'd love to have the IS. It was about twice the cost though. At that point in my hobby I was unwilling to pay a grand.
It was quite a step up from my kit as far as contrast and color.
Can't wait to pair it with a new body with better ISO performance.
Only way I use mine ... just chase up the ISO if the shutterspeed falls below 1/500.
Frodo said:
One thing not mentioned is lens flare. I had a non-IS 70-200/4 for years, but could not shoot into the lght, especially with the sun in the frame, without having objectionable flare.
One thing not mentioned is lens flare. I had a non-IS 70-200/4 for years, but could not shoot into the lght, especially with the sun in the frame, without having objectionable flare.
I don't have this problem with my 70-200mm f/4 ... perhaps your filter caused the flares (or the lack of one)?
[/quote]
While I keep filters on most of lenses most of the time, I remove them when shooting into the light. Here is the best photo of a series shooting into the rising sun. The subsequent photos when the sun rose further were unusable (and deleted). This was 200mm @ 5.6 on a 5DII.
One thing not mentioned is lens flare. I had a non-IS 70-200/4 for years, but could not shoot into the lght, especially with the sun in the frame, without having objectionable flare.
While I keep filters on most of lenses most of the time, I remove them when shooting into the light. Here is the best photo of a series shooting into the rising sun. The subsequent photos when the sun rose further were unusable (and deleted). This was 200mm @ 5.6 on a 5DII.
[/quote]
fantastc picture!
I don't use filters anymore... I had some good quality ones but I was never satisfied...