I really enjoy my 70D but wonder if the 7D would have better IQ. When I look at DxO scores for these two, it's pretty much a dead heat. Anyone out there have first-hand experience comparing the two? Thanks in advance.
validus1978 said:my opinion 70 D has better colors and gradients , more setting like digic 5+ better images on good light condition but 70D has more noise ever since low ISO
neuroanatomist said:The 70D gives sharper images SOOC, due to a weaker AA filter.
http://www.the-digital-picture.com/Reviews/ISO-12233-Sample-Crops.aspx?Lens=458&Camera=673&Sample=0&FLI=0&API=3&LensComp=458&CameraComp=845&SampleComp=0&FLIComp=0&APIComp=3
ashmadux said:this is kind of a crazy question.
7d is NOWHERE as good. The 7d has the absolute worst iso performance of any canon ive used. Grainy skies in well exposed iso 100? No thanks.
Seriously though, there is no reason to buy a 7d anymore, especially 7 current prices. its going on 5 years old, and still north of a grand- not a good investment at all.
DxOmark scores also don't clearly show the nature of the noise.JumboShrimp said:I really enjoy my 70D but wonder if the 7D would have better IQ. When I look at DxO scores for these two, it's pretty much a dead heat. Anyone out there have first-hand experience comparing the two? Thanks in advance.
Steb said:For me it was the other way around. I decided end of last year to buy a 7D after comparing it with a 70D. I already own a 5D3 and from an ergonomic point of view the 7D body is a perfect match, the 70D clearly has a reduced feature set here. And since I only use the raw files I don't care about the better processing with newer DIGIC. Raw noise performance is no different between the two models. IMHO the only real advantages for the 70D are the new video features and the sooc picture quality. If you don't need any of those you get better build quality and better ergonomics with the 7D.
AlanF said:As I posted earlier, the big difference is in AF. The 7D's AF is far more erratic and has real difficulties on such combinations as the 300mm f/2.8 II with 2xTC. This has been corrected with the 70D, which is why I sold my 7D and bought the 70D. The other differences between the two are minor. N
canonrumorstony said:But the question of this thread is about IQ, not AF.
Aglet said:DxOmark scores also don't clearly show the nature of the noise.JumboShrimp said:I really enjoy my 70D but wonder if the 7D would have better IQ. When I look at DxO scores for these two, it's pretty much a dead heat. Anyone out there have first-hand experience comparing the two? Thanks in advance.
many 7Ds show patterned noise, especially in shadow tones
70Ds I've tested have much less pattern noise
Aglet said:random noise is OK, pattern noise is bad
no noise is even better but we're still waiting for Canon to catch up to everyone else on noise metrics.
As I am fond of saying.... Who cares how many stops of dynamic range a blurry picture has.... Accurate focus is by far the most critical aspect in the search for better images... Nobody makes a sensor or lens that could have saved this shot....neuroanatomist said:canonrumorstony said:But the question of this thread is about IQ, not AF.
Accurate focus is critical for image quality.
Aglet said:...no noise is even better but we're still waiting for Canon to catch up to everyone else on noise metrics.
100 said:By the way, “noise metrics” do not only apply to iso’s below iso 1600. Above iso 1600 Canon is on par or preforming better.
JumboShrimp said:I really enjoy my 70D but wonder if the 7D would have better IQ. When I look at DxO scores for these two, it's pretty much a dead heat. Anyone out there have first-hand experience comparing the two? Thanks in advance.