I post too Much on Here!!
- Jul 21, 2010
On the RP, they’re about the same size with lenses retracted. The longer extension of the RF 28-70/2 means that when extended, the RP combo is still longer, not .5” shorter as you claimed.The second set of pictures assumes they’re mounted in the same location of the body. I don’t own an R and instead bought RP for non work related shoots and to get familiar with my RF lenses until a pro comes out.
On the RP the lens mounts about an inch further into the grip than my Mark IV.
It’s not shorter. You’re the one making a fuss, replying multiple times with the same incorrect statements, and claiming you know how to measure a camera. You obviously don’t. It’s that simple.Now you’re going to get out your pocket rule and say.... well actually it’s blah blah cm closer not about an inch and the 28-70 is actually .3875 inches shorter measured that way not .5”.
Which is exactly my point. The differences are so minute it’s not even worth debating or making a huge fuss over haha.
But instead of being mature and just admitting you were wrong, you are falling back on blah blah blah they’re pretty close, blah blah blah it doesn’t really matter anyway. Typical forum behavior, but commonness doesn’t make it any less pathetic. It’s amusing that you keep making yourself appear even more ridiculous. That does seem to be one thing for which you do have some aptitude.