I did own a Nauticam NA-R50 for the Canon R50 for about 5 months but sold it... I didn't like being locked into just using "wet" expensive lenses you bayonet on outside the fixed housing's port.
Hey, thanks a lot for the long post, appreciate the input from someone who actually has experience>
Could you please elaborate the above? I didn't quite get that.
For me, Ikelite was somehow too....simple? Not very refined. The flash arms were wobbling in the housing and were heavy and crap. The whole experience was just so uncomfortable. Ikelite's huge advantage is being cheap...but then...it's cheap.
The other thing is that travelling with 40D's housing and 2x DS-200 strobes and arms was just a nightmare. I made an oath, one day I'm putting together a compact setup. In the meantime I do NOT want a G series cam or something like that, I'm not going below APS-C. For some time I was dreaming about some EOS M setup but never realized.
Now with R50V which is hopefully not the last of it's kind, a new era might start.
As I mentioned in a previous post, I'm not sure if I can make it without a fisheye zoom on APS-C. And unfortunately I won't know until I try. The Sigma 10-18/2.8 with it's compact size and 270g weight is very tempting. Kinda expensive ways to learn, but I haven't found a better way yet.
I'm not a fan of kit lenses. But yet again, who knows, maybe I should try.
On that note, and please don't take it the wrong way, appreciate every word from you, but the images you posted and also the ones in the article do not really have the sharpness/detail I'm aiming for. If it's the lens or the dome or what, I have no idea.