Nice! I am waiting for details on an potential R7, an R1, and an RF 135L. A high megapixel camera would be nice, but it would have to be very seriously out perform or match the utility of the R5 to even be considered by me right now.
Upvote
0
It theoretically can.Maybe, but I think the R1 is still some way off. I also think there's a possibility at least, that the R1 will be a dual-resolution camera, switchable between hi-res (80MP?) at low burst speeds, or uncropped lo-res (20MP?) with fast burst speeds and small file sizes. I'm no expert on the technicalities, but perhaps quad-pixel might allow this?
IIRC all the high megapixel sensors Canon has shown were APS-H, so in full frame you'd get even more pixels.Canon made an official development announcement for a 120MP DSLR in 2015, so they have had plenty of time to work on high megapixels.
Spot on... Our staff has 3 bodies with them. Norm is to wear two, with two different lenses and the 3rd is the backup- If the r1 Becomes a reality. Every kit will have 3 R1's in themNot everyone, including pros, can afford to buy two of the latest generation of cameras. Many will place greater importance on buying extra (or better) lenses, and will often have one high end body, plus a cheap RP or R as an emergency backup.
But for those who *can* afford two hi-end bodies, it can make a lot of sense if they are identical. There will be many people who want a pair of identical bodies that can serve both for ultra hi-res and action, by simply switching resolution modes. The controls and operation of both bodies will be identical, eliminating any muscle-memory issues.
And, if one of those bodies fails or has to go in for service, you can still shoot any type of project with the identical second body. If you have two different bodies, that may not be possible.
And no need to cool down to 6° Kshoot that with the 1200 F8L and a few teleconvertors and NASA wasted 10 billion on the james webb
shoot that with the 1200 F8L and a few teleconvertors and NASA wasted 10 billion on the james webb
And no need to cool down to 6° K
because they could make it two and a half times as expensiveWhy would Canon want to sell you one camera that does everything when they could sell you two cameras that each do half of everything?
Fear of shareholders. Because other companies will offer the feature.Why would Canon want to sell you one camera that does everything when they could sell you two cameras that each do half of everything?
That sensor has a really slow readout speed, even in the cropped, 10-bit capture mode on the M6II you still get severe rolling shutter artefacts.Using the "pixel" tech in EOS 90D/M6 Mark II should lead to about 82Mp. But we're used to see Canon making specific decisions/conceptions on new products, so maybe 75Mp could also be the right guess.
Capturing as much detail as possible per shot is one use case, like for landscape photography.Why do people want more than 50 mpex on 35mm? Honest question. Thx.
The example from the past was 5Div @ USD3500, 5DS @USD3700 and 5DSR @ USD3900 so up to USD400 difference depending on the AA filter. The R5s won't be a volume seller though
Having had an H6d 100C here for a while with an HTS1.5 tilt/shift adapter, I'm rather liking working with 100MP images on occasionsWhy do people want more than 50 mpex on 35mm? Honest question. Thx.