Happy (Canon) holiday season and leave the socks hanging on the fireplace for Santa is rumored to visit in January with new dSLRs. As mentioned in subject I'm totally baffled if it's better to part with my 24/1.4L II prime and get a 24-70/2.8L II or keep it and get a 35/1.4L II.
I'm shooting landscapes and f/1.4 has proven of no real use to me but I need the best 24mm throughout the aperture range. I have now decided to get a slightly wider than 50mm lens for more flexibility and the new 35/1.4L II is a real temptation, then again f/1.4 is not a priority but all other apertures are. 24/1.4+35/1.4 sound like a perfect quality match. On the other hand, if you've tried is the 24-70/2.8L II comparable from f/2.8 and above and up to 50mm or don't I even bother?
I'm shooting landscapes and f/1.4 has proven of no real use to me but I need the best 24mm throughout the aperture range. I have now decided to get a slightly wider than 50mm lens for more flexibility and the new 35/1.4L II is a real temptation, then again f/1.4 is not a priority but all other apertures are. 24/1.4+35/1.4 sound like a perfect quality match. On the other hand, if you've tried is the 24-70/2.8L II comparable from f/2.8 and above and up to 50mm or don't I even bother?