Not my point. I doubt an intention to reduce gray marketing had anything to do with these names. Rebel was the brand in the US, Kiss in Japan, and just a number/letter in the rest of the world, because they wanted specific branding to promote sales in the two largest markets, and didn't bother with any specificity for European countries or elsewhere. They could have marketed it as the Lascaux in France and the Azulejo in Portugal, but those markets weren't worth the effort.I agree that the purpose of different names was initially to reduce grey marketing - an American male would I think definitely prefer to pay full whack for a "Rebel" rather than save a few dollars and have the humiliation of having "Kiss" plastered across the front of his camera.
That part, I agree with.I also agree that the non-homogenous nature of Europe could be a reason why acronyms are used instead of names. The *choice* of the actual names "Kiss" and "Rebel" was I think as I stated, i.e. based on perceptions of the national psyche of Japan and the US.
Upvote
0