AI Focus tracking issue, or user error?

Status
Not open for further replies.

EOBeav

Not going anywhere
May 4, 2011
434
20
56
about.me
I shot this with a 5DmkII and a 70-200mm f/4 L, AF AI Servo mode. As you can tell, the image is focused just behind the runner, yet I had the focal point zeroed in on the runner's chest the entire time. Otherwise, the lens autofocuses really well. Is it me, or my gear? Should I plan on focusing just in front of the runner to compensate for AF lag?

Granted, my body/lens combo is suited more for landscapes than it is high school football. The easy answer here is to say "get a 70-200mm f/2.8 L IS", but that ain't gonna happen any time soon.

Thanks in advance for your thoughts. EXIF data is listed just below the image. See the largest file size for more detail if you need to.


Touchdown! by Rick.Scheibner, on Flickr

EXIF:
Exposure 0.001 sec (1/800)
Aperture f/4.0
Focal Length 200 mm
ISO Speed 500
Exposure Bias 0 EV
 

EOBeav

Not going anywhere
May 4, 2011
434
20
56
about.me
Mt Spokane Photography said:
Focusing on a runner coming toward you is challenging for any camera, and a 5D MK II is going to be weak in that application. This is where a 7D or better yet, a 5D MK III will be noticibly better.

So it's the body and not the lens? I was hoping your response would justify getting a 135mm f/2 for basketball season. :)
 
Upvote 0
P

PackLight

Guest
EOBeav said:
Mt Spokane Photography said:
Focusing on a runner coming toward you is challenging for any camera, and a 5D MK II is going to be weak in that application. This is where a 7D or better yet, a 5D MK III will be noticibly better.

So it's the body and not the lens? I was hoping your response would justify getting a 135mm f/2 for basketball season. :)

Well of course both a lens and new body would help :p
 
Upvote 0
Jul 21, 2010
31,228
13,091
EOBeav said:
So it's the body and not the lens? I was hoping your response would justify getting a 135mm f/2 for basketball season. :)

Sorry to disappoint. :p My 5DII in AI Servo had trouble keeping up with my 3-4 year old daughter running towards me, let alone a football player. My 7D could do it, even with a lens as slow-focusing as the 85L II.
 
Upvote 0

EOBeav

Not going anywhere
May 4, 2011
434
20
56
about.me
neuroanatomist said:
Sorry to disappoint. :p My 5DII in AI Servo had trouble keeping up with my 3-4 year old daughter running towards me, let alone a football player. My 7D could do it, even with a lens as slow-focusing as the 85L II.

I was just about to get the 7D last winter when I saw that the 5DmkII took a price dip. I went that route instead, and couldn't be happier. It's been great for landscapes and the few portraits that I do. Really getting into sports photography would require some additional investment that I'm not really willing to make right now, so I'll just need to make due with what I've got. I'll still hold out for that 135mm f/2 for basketball season, though.
 
Upvote 0
neuroanatomist said:
EOBeav said:
So it's the body and not the lens? I was hoping your response would justify getting a 135mm f/2 for basketball season. :)

Sorry to disappoint. :p My 5DII in AI Servo had trouble keeping up with my 3-4 year old daughter running towards me, let alone a football player. My 7D could do it, even with a lens as slow-focusing as the 85L II.

+1. Turn on the assist focal points, but I don't really see much of an improvement with them activated. Use the longest focal length you can -- distance is your friend. Take bursts. If the subject is close and moving toward the camera, expect to throw most of the shots away.
 
Upvote 0

EOBeav

Not going anywhere
May 4, 2011
434
20
56
about.me
neuroanatomist said:
Focal length is 200mm. To frame a 6' person means 35-40' away, assuming no further cropping. If that's his shadow in the picture, he's well over 20' tall...

Actually, it is my shadow. The sun was very low on the horizon, as you could also tell by the very warm tones and other long shadows from the players. I was standing just behind the end zone, and he was crossing the goal line when this photo was taken.
 
Upvote 0
EOBeav said:
Mt Spokane Photography said:
Focusing on a runner coming toward you is challenging for any camera, and a 5D MK II is going to be weak in that application. This is where a 7D or better yet, a 5D MK III will be noticibly better.

So it's the body and not the lens? I was hoping your response would justify getting a 135mm f/2 for basketball season. :)
There are other justfications for the 135 f/2. The wider aperture will be better for indoor sports and it also makes a useful landscape lens for longer viewpoints (although you do already have a 70-200). Also, if you're tracking sideways, the 5D MkII will cope better, as the focal distance won't change so quickly.
 
Upvote 0

EOBeav

Not going anywhere
May 4, 2011
434
20
56
about.me
Kernuak said:
There are other justfications for the 135 f/2. The wider aperture will be better for indoor sports and it also makes a useful landscape lens for longer viewpoints (although you do already have a 70-200). Also, if you're tracking sideways, the 5D MkII will cope better, as the focal distance won't change so quickly.

Excellent. I'll clip this out and show it to the wife. Her son also plays basketball and will be featured more in that sport. It's imperative that we get the appropriate glass to use in a fast-moving sport that takes place in a dimly lit gym.
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.