Are new dream lenses coming for the RF mount? [CR1]
- Thread starter Canon Rumors
- Start date
Oh a dream lens you say? Like the EF 50 1.4 ll we all (Adam S.) waited for endlessly?
Let's see if they will make one in RF form. tick tock (growing old)
Let's see if they will make one in RF form. tick tock (growing old)
Upvote
0
I do not disagree but when traveling (walking) for birding I carry a D850 with 500 5.6PF in one hand and another in the other hand. This second camera used to be a 5DIV with 16-35 f/4L IS but it is a bulky combination as a concurrently second handheld camera. So I use 200D (=SL2) with EF-S10-18 and I also got a secondhand EF-S15-85. I would like to not have to also change lenses in that second camera....
Upvote
0
Canon just need to get a move on fleshing out the line with the standard lenses, like a 24MM L and 35MM L etc.
Upvote
0
Yep, the RF 24-105 L is considerably better than the EF version, and as you say, not far off from the RF 24-70 L. Don't really see a need at all for an f/4 24-70. Just my opinion, though.
Upvote
0
I have used the RF 100 for about a month and still have not found any issues with focus shift. Of cause I don't shoot test charts but flying bees. Maybe that's my mistake.
Upvote
0
L
Loswr
Guest
Canon stated that the focus shift exhibited by the lens was a design trade-off with increasing the magnification to 1.4x. It’s definitely a real issue, not an Internet phenomenon.I have used the RF 100 for about a month and still have not found any issues with focus shift. Of cause I don't shoot test charts but flying bees. Maybe that's my mistake.
Focus shift gets worse the closer your subject is to the MFD. It’s also aperture-dependent, and if you’re wide open or reasonably stopped down, it does not affect the image. I would guess that at typical flying bee working distances, you would not expect to have a problem with focus shift. It can be an issue in other used cases.
Upvote
0
I guess you meant waiting and saving, since Nikon's TS 19mm costs $4000, if I'm not mistaken...
Canon's 14mm TSE could even be a bit ($$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$) more expensive, i'm afraid !
Upvote
0
For me the other way around, I would love to have a 35-105 f/2.8 more or less compact non-L non-IS as allways on lense, because the 70/75mm on full frame are often too short for me and 105 f/2.8 should also give better bokeh than 70 f/2.8.I would love to have a 20-70mm f2,8.
The 24-70 is fine for most situations, but often I find myself wanting a wider focal lense. It would be way more versatile in my opinion
Upvote
0
I have posted some examples in the insect thread:
Upvote
0
Similar threads
