What will the future of the R100 be? I feel each of the APS-C RF bodies should have got an extra 0 to the model name to match the DSLR naming and performance tier, the R100 for example feels more like an R1000.
doorstops
Upvote
0
What will the future of the R100 be? I feel each of the APS-C RF bodies should have got an extra 0 to the model name to match the DSLR naming and performance tier, the R100 for example feels more like an R1000.
Right! I would name the R100 the R1000, and the R50 the R100, to match it. Yes, the R50 follows the M50s, and for the normal user it is easier to understand the names. That is what is important for a company, not to match it in a usefull way
There was also a 100D (a low-end entry APS-C body) well before the 90D, which is a more high-end APS-C body, so no need to make it sensefull.
Maybe, or hopefully, they will make "Mark"-Versions for the R10 and R50.
They're a little light and ergonomically wrong for that use case. Maybe paperweights?doorstops
And in revenge for all the unkind things you have said about it, it will cause you to stumble through the doordoorstops
Canon is DOOMED™!
I was at work and not fast enoughI would have betted that this is comment #1, so I would have lost, because it only made #2
Perhaps (???) in "poor countries" they price it low enough to sell well there.What will the future of the R100 be?
On the same subject.
(But not expecting you to watch it -- I haven't !)
Jared Polin, Canon EOS R10 vs R50 vs R100: Which Camera SHOULD You Buy?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VOi131bU7M0
Perhaps (???) in "poor countries" they price it low enough to sell well there.