Beginning of a new Canon starting with 7D Mk II?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Apr 27, 2013
34
0
4,806
Canon has definitely stretched the limits of their current tech, reading all the reviews feels similar in all aspects (hell the 700D is barely a refresh!)

I just feel like it's getting stale and the competition is definitely growing up fast (Sony RX1, Samsung NX300)
The AF on the Samsung NX300 is just ridiculous especially at that price point.

How long can Canon keep the same playbook, yeah they have a new sensor in the works and their new live view AF should be announced next month but these are higher end models while other companies are bringing it to their lower end models quite quickly and already are working on successors that should compete with Canon's new tech.

I'm awaiting to see what the 7D Mark II brings since that will eventually trickle down to the Rebel/EOS M series.

I guess I'm ready for an upgrade and I want to stick to Canon due to my lenses yet I'm just twiddling my thumbs while the competition looks more appealing with each announcement.
 
Some interesting points - I'd like to see more advanced features such as AF in lower end bodies too.

What body do you have at present and what is lacking from Canon's current offerings that is not satisfactory for your needs.

Cheers
 
Upvote 0
I have a Canon 550D with a Sigma 17-70 F2.8-5.6 and Canon 50mm F1.4

Honestly, I'd be happy with a improved Canon SL1/EOS M with adapter. I don't like bulk since I shoot on the run a lot and don't need many of the features that the higher end models have.
 
Upvote 0
northbyten said:
I guess I'm ready for an upgrade and I want to stick to Canon due to my lenses yet I'm just twiddling my thumbs while the competition looks more appealing with each announcement.

[quote author=northbyten]
I have a Canon 550D with a Sigma 17-70 F2.8-5.6 and Canon 50mm F1.4

Honestly, I'd be happy with a improved Canon SL1/EOS M with adapter. I don't like bulk since I shoot on the run a lot and don't need many of the features that the higher end models have.

[/quote]

So, what features do you need?

The 550D is a good camera, do you feel you need more resolution? (to what end?) do you feel you need better AF? (there are options) lower noise? (again there are options)

Between the 550D, 600D and 650D the changes are absolutely incremental. I changed from a 550D to a 600D because the flip out screen is brilliant for video, and the wireless flash is very useful. Haven't felt the need to upgrade any further. Thats said, I would say my new M (Figic5) is less noisy, to the point where iso 200 is like iso 100 on my digic 4 cameras, 800 like 400, and crucially, 6400 becomes to my fickle eye, usable with a little raw tweaking.

What would you want from a 750D that your 550D isn't doing, or the 600, 650 700 aren't doing?

I agree that canon need to stay competitive and that things have moved on maybe a little faster than canon has. However there have been quite a few new lenses, and not just expensive ones, maybe thats something to explore, expand your range with a macro or telezoom, or a fast tele prime like the 85 f1.8 or 100 f2.0? When Canon does come out with something new then you'll be even better equipped to use it!

The good news is that Canon often launches new tech on the rebels, which have usually been a bit ahead of the x0d series for megapixels and things like movie mode, perhaps as this is the most competitive segment, or where the most sales are, or where the range is quickest refreshed (or a mix of all of the above) but you'll usually see the newest sensors on the rebels.

I'm just intrigued as to why you want to upgrade? Is it an itch or a need?

All the best
 
Upvote 0
northbyten said:
"I guess I'm ready for an upgrade and I want to stick to Canon due to my lenses yet"

I have a Canon 550D with a Sigma 17-70 F2.8-5.6 and Canon 50mm F1.4
Honestly, I'd be happy with a improved Canon SL1/EOS M with adapter. I don't like bulk since I shoot on the run a lot and don't need many of the features that the higher end models have.

With that MUCH lenses, I highly recommend you to switch NOW.
 
Upvote 0
First of all I'm a fast shooter, I move a lot and I shoot in all conditions. I've been photographing for 8 years.

The AF on my model isn't good for anything other than direct sunlight and it slows down, often still being slightly out of focus. I manually focus 90% of the time but there are times when I simply want to point and click(warranty ran out a month before AF got buggered)

I'd like a AF beam which even the NEX series has instead of using the flash strobe.

I want better colour reproduction, the photos I've seen straight out of the camera from other manufacturers is amazing instead of me having to tweak colours to appear right in post production.

I want to downsize more than anything, something small and efficient, a interchangable lens Sony RX1 made by Canon would be my ideal camera.


Dylan777 said:
northbyten said:
"I guess I'm ready for an upgrade and I want to stick to Canon due to my lenses yet"

I have a Canon 550D with a Sigma 17-70 F2.8-5.6 and Canon 50mm F1.4
Honestly, I'd be happy with a improved Canon SL1/EOS M with adapter. I don't like bulk since I shoot on the run a lot and don't need many of the features that the higher end models have.

With that MUCH lenses, I highly recommend you to switch NOW.

?
 
Upvote 0
Are you using live view af or viewfinder af?

Live view af is crap, except on eos m ( good in oneshot single square zone) viewfinder af good on 550d, centre af select best. Viewfinder crap for mf. Wrong focus screen, penta mirror etc...
 
Upvote 0
I want to see voice annotation on a camera other than the 1D line. Nikon does it.. THe D3/D4 etc aren't the only cameras with voice annotation. The 7DII as a "sports" camera with 10fps (rumored) should have it as well if they really want serious sports shooters using it. Now that I have annotation, I don't think I could ever use a camera without it again, it's that integral to my workflow not only for sports but for just plain old assignments. Its much easier to listen to the .wav file than to figure out "where the hell did I put that paper with that persons name????"
 
Upvote 0
I was thinking the other day that it would be interesting to try the shutter button on the inside of the handgrip where your fingertips rest. A kind of squeeze to shoot configuration.


Would be nice to have a rollerball type controller instead of the joystick. Would probably make selecting and changing focus points quicker. Or even a smooth interface like the Apple Magic Mouse.
 
Upvote 0
The 7D is a quite old model, and is out of date. But, it goes up against the high end Nikon D300S.

I would warn you to not expect a "NEW" Canon, they will certainly have a better sensor, and there will be improvements, but they will not give you every feature that you want.

Expect to be disappointed if you think otherwise.
 
Upvote 0
northbyten said:
paul13walnut5 said:
Are you using live view af or viewfinder af?

Live view af is crap, except on eos m ( good in oneshot single square zone) viewfinder af good on 550d, centre af select best. Viewfinder crap for mf. Wrong focus screen, penta mirror etc...

nope just through viewfinder.

I would say wait for a new 70d or 7d mk2.

The current 7d and 60d won't give you any better data in your images.
However the improved af systems will help you, and the pentaprism rather than penta mirror will help mf, maybe also worth fitting a katzeyes screen when available.

Do note, focus will be hypercriticsl at f1.4, and your af, edpecially away from the centre point, will not play that nice with your zoom at the far end.

I would try the cam in one shot mode, centre point select, lock af and recompose.

This should up your keepers, or reveal a fault.

For moving stuff, try centre spot af but in ai servo mode, track, track, burst, track, track, burst.

99% of 'faulty' af systems are just incorrectly set up for the task at hand.

Avoid ai focus and auto point select like you would a frisky pit-bull.
 
Upvote 0
Just a thought .....

In the old days of film people like me had as much fun and enjoyment getting that great picture by different techniques that had nothing to do with software. Some of the most iconic pictures are black and white from many many years ago. The only issue of course was how long it took to process and how many pictures were not used.

How much more technolgy should cameras have before they become "boring" because they do too much for you?
 
Upvote 0
CanonMan said:
How much more technolgy should cameras have before they become "boring" because they do too much for you?

well, Canon can still go a VERY long ways from my current 7D until I would find more technology and capabilities "boring". Most of it is even invented already and would be dirt cheap to implement. :-)

e.g.
* twice the resolution AND 3 stops better DR at all ISOs - especially at ISO 100 and up to 25600 [=Nikon D800]
* Hybrid AF with contrast and phase-AF on image sensor ... working 10x faster and more accurate, especially in tracking moving objects
* WIFI and GPS built in
* EX-RT radio wireless flash commander built in
* working Eye Control AF v2.0
* in-body IS working in tandem with IS lenses for a total effect of 5 or 6 stops stabilization
* invisible IR-laser AF illuminator built in
* fully functional and customizable Auto-ISO [Nikon D800]
* 2nd curtain sync for speedlights in wireless ETTL mode [Nikon]
* better batteries lasting 1000 shots ... between -10 and +40 degrees celsius
* mirrorless FF body the size of a pack of cigarettes [Sony RX-1] with lens mount and EVF
* "Retina"-EVF [350 dpi +]
* a series of tiny hi-IQ, fixed focal pancake lenses between 20/2.8 and 75/2.8 IS [like 40/2.8]
* EF-S or EF-M 50-150mm f/2.8 IS in black and half the size of a 70-200/2.8 II :-)
* Canon cameras without any video capability - "for stills only" at a significant price discount -25%
* ...

I could easily go on for 2 full pages ... without getting bored ... ever!
 
Upvote 0
AvTvM said:
CanonMan said:
How much more technolgy should cameras have before they become "boring" because they do too much for you?

well, Canon can still go a VERY long ways from my current 7D until I would find more technology and capabilities "boring". Most of it is even invented already and would be dirt cheap to implement. :-)


* working Eye Control AF v2.0

(would be version 5.0, 1st implemention, 5 point horizontal only in A2e, 2nd implementation, 3 point as in Elan IIe and IXe, 3rd Implementation, 7 point in Elan 7/n, 4th implementation, 45 point of EOS 3.)

* in-body IS working in tandem with IS lenses for a total effect of 5 or 6 stops stabilization

A shiftable sensor would be useful. Could be used to do some slight TS-E movements on a normal lens...


* 2nd curtain sync for speedlights in wireless ETTL mode [Nikon]

How would 2nd curtain trigger? Would need to be by radio, or capacitor timer.. optically wouldn't work during the exposure, i.e. before the curtain shuts.

* a series of tiny hi-IQ, fixed focal pancake lenses between 20/2.8 and 75/2.8 IS [like 40/2.8]

If pentax can do it why can't canon, would be good if they were cheap too, like the 40mm



* Canon cameras without any video capability - "for stills only" at a significant price discount -25%

The technology is already implemented largely for live view. It would not represent a 25% saving.
Video has an off switch, a bit like auto mode and HDR. Don't like don't use. The extra sales video brings in probably helps to keep the overall price down. Especially with cameras like the 5D3


I could easily go on for 2 full pages ... without getting bored ... ever!
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.