BIRD IN FLIGHT ONLY -- share your BIF photos here

neuroanatomist said:
StudentOfLight said:
Quick question... I'm not familiar with the 600L. The background looks quite busy, is that due to post-processing or is that a characteristic of the lens?

It's the lens plus the TC combined with the complexity and relative closeness of the background.
I have the same issue with my Tamron 150-600mm especially with grass/reeds. I thought the Tamron's backgropund rendering was poor, but perhaps it is just a reality of having reeds/grass near to the subject. Does the rendering change with TC removed?
 
Upvote 0
StudentOfLight said:
neuroanatomist said:
StudentOfLight said:
Quick question... I'm not familiar with the 600L. The background looks quite busy, is that due to post-processing or is that a characteristic of the lens?

It's the lens plus the TC combined with the complexity and relative closeness of the background.
I have the same issue with my Tamron 150-600mm especially with grass/reeds. I thought the Tamron's backgropund rendering was poor, but perhaps it is just a reality of having reeds/grass near to the subject. Does the rendering change with TC removed?

I believe it's the TC. Here are a couple of examples with the bare 600 and complex backgrounds, quite close for the GBH, a bit further for the swans. The bokeh is not nearly so 'nervous'.
 

Attachments

  • Phthth.jpg
    Phthth.jpg
    466.9 KB · Views: 170
  • Lovebirds.jpg
    Lovebirds.jpg
    315.9 KB · Views: 156
Upvote 0
Belted Kingfisher

Canon 1Dx, Canon 600mm f/4 IS II + 1.4x TC, from a blind

Click image to see larger version. Thanks.

www.whistlingwingsphotography.com
 

Attachments

  • Belted Kingfisher male diving perchIII 1200cr.jpg
    Belted Kingfisher male diving perchIII 1200cr.jpg
    925.7 KB · Views: 200
Upvote 0
rbielefeld said:
Belted Kingfisher

Canon 1Dx, Canon 600mm f/4 IS II + 1.4x TC, from a blind

Click image to see larger version. Thanks.

www.whistlingwingsphotography.com

Absolutely Fantastic. Just perfect. Super impressed. The shot is sharp, the exposure is spot on and the pose is to die for. Made however long you had to wait in the blind worth every second.
 
Upvote 0
Canadian bomber loses load

Small groups of Canada Geese were leaving the park just before sunset. I was positioned upwind so they were flying directly at me or slightly to either side which provided me with some opportunities to see what this little camera and cheap tele lens could do with moving subjects. Hit rate is lower than a good SLR, of course, but when it connects the IQ is acceptable, as is the purchase price.

Olympus OM-D E-M10 micro-four-thirds mirrorless with 40-150mm kit zoom
1/3 scale of whole image cropped vertically only, processed with Iridient Developer 3.0.2
150mm, 1600 ISO, 1/3200s, f/8, single shot mode, center AF point

edit (typo)
 

Attachments

  • Canadian Bomber loses load - EM101538.jpg
    Canadian Bomber loses load - EM101538.jpg
    95.7 KB · Views: 171
Upvote 0
Jack Douglas said:
rbielefeld, having tried myself I know how fast those guys are. Wouldn't a blind hinder your ability to pan?

Great shot.

Jack

Jack, yes the blind does not help. You only have a bit of room to pan, but it can be done if the bird goes in a direction that allow some panning room.
 
Upvote 0