Now with my beloved EOS 5D3 having apoplexia after salt water immersion in the Indian Ocean the question of a replacement bod has arisen. I still have my Sony A6000 and I am learning it. Also, the 35mm f/1.8 lens brings up the edge that was not visible while I was only shooling with the Zony Zoom.
But to the Canon body.
First things first. Maybe it is possible to fix it good and maybe it will perform reliably after it has been properly diagnosed and the faulty parts changed. Maybe.
But if not.
My visit to eBay revealed that the 5DII is seriously overpriced still and that the 5DIII are few and far apart.
I have found a 5DIII at 1500 euros/1900dollars second hand and I am going to se it tomorrow.
This would probably be the most logical backup for the drowned and probably not 100% reliable 5DIII which only has 13000 clicks on its shutter.
yeah, this seems like the way to go but meanwhile I got other thoughts.
The 5D IV was launched. Focusing system revised, new sensor, touch screen (I hate touch screens!) 4K cropped video and so many bells and whistles that it will take a couple more readings to figure out what this camera really is.
5DS is selling at 2500 dollars with all its megapixels and high definition. According to Tony Northup you get Nikon 810 quality after a couple of clicks on Lightroom. the full resolution images are huge and my computer will dramatically slow down with the 50MB files.
5DsR is selling at 2800 dollars. It is more expensive because...I don't know exactly why. NOT having the anti-alias filter should make a camera cheaper in my logic but no.
I do portraits and sceneries. No sports, no weddings hardly any video.
I cannot stand things that black out in the middle of something. I hate it when something expensive just does not work...yes, I am talking about Sony A6000/Metabones/Canon EF lenses...
Would a Sony A7RII with the Metabones IV be an option here? I break stuff that just does not work...
Please give your opinions.
As things are now, I'll go and grab the 1500 euro 5D3 if it has a reasonable shutter count, less than 100 000.
Yes, I have the software on my Mac to get the count directly from the body, thank you.
What would Je..you do?
But to the Canon body.
First things first. Maybe it is possible to fix it good and maybe it will perform reliably after it has been properly diagnosed and the faulty parts changed. Maybe.
But if not.
My visit to eBay revealed that the 5DII is seriously overpriced still and that the 5DIII are few and far apart.
I have found a 5DIII at 1500 euros/1900dollars second hand and I am going to se it tomorrow.
This would probably be the most logical backup for the drowned and probably not 100% reliable 5DIII which only has 13000 clicks on its shutter.
yeah, this seems like the way to go but meanwhile I got other thoughts.
The 5D IV was launched. Focusing system revised, new sensor, touch screen (I hate touch screens!) 4K cropped video and so many bells and whistles that it will take a couple more readings to figure out what this camera really is.
5DS is selling at 2500 dollars with all its megapixels and high definition. According to Tony Northup you get Nikon 810 quality after a couple of clicks on Lightroom. the full resolution images are huge and my computer will dramatically slow down with the 50MB files.
5DsR is selling at 2800 dollars. It is more expensive because...I don't know exactly why. NOT having the anti-alias filter should make a camera cheaper in my logic but no.
I do portraits and sceneries. No sports, no weddings hardly any video.
I cannot stand things that black out in the middle of something. I hate it when something expensive just does not work...yes, I am talking about Sony A6000/Metabones/Canon EF lenses...
Would a Sony A7RII with the Metabones IV be an option here? I break stuff that just does not work...
Please give your opinions.
As things are now, I'll go and grab the 1500 euro 5D3 if it has a reasonable shutter count, less than 100 000.
Yes, I have the software on my Mac to get the count directly from the body, thank you.
What would Je..you do?