@!ex said:Whoever is taking pics tonight, lets all post our shots later and compare.
bdunbar79 said:My luck tonight was as follows: The scene you see here SHOULD have been the viewpoint of the fireworks: (yes that "junk" you see beside the lightning, is heavy hail and rain, it is not a photo artifact :-[)
TrumpetPower! said:Bulb is waaaaaay too long. You want an exposure in the range of a few to several seconds. Just as with lightning and with flash, aperture controls exposure; shutter speed controls the length of the tracks. Base ISO is good.
The challenge for exposure with fireworks comes when you try to shoot more than just the fireworks themselves, like including upturned faces or the city skyline. There's even going to be a full moon low in the sky on the Fourth...if you can shoot the moon and the fireworks, fantastic, but good luck getting the exposure right....
Cheers,
b&
scottkinfw said:I used f11 or so, iso 100 and 3 to 6 second exposures and got way different results.
I'll post a few.
TrumpetPower! said:Bulb is waaaaaay too long. You want an exposure in the range of a few to several seconds. Just as with lightning and with flash, aperture controls exposure; shutter speed controls the length of the tracks. Base ISO is good.
The challenge for exposure with fireworks comes when you try to shoot more than just the fireworks themselves, like including upturned faces or the city skyline. There's even going to be a full moon low in the sky on the Fourth...if you can shoot the moon and the fireworks, fantastic, but good luck getting the exposure right....
Cheers,
b&
scottkinfw said:Here is one in about the 4 second range
scottkinfw said:I used f11 or so, iso 100 and 3 to 6 second exposures and got way different results.
I'll post a few.
TrumpetPower! said:Bulb is waaaaaay too long. You want an exposure in the range of a few to several seconds. Just as with lightning and with flash, aperture controls exposure; shutter speed controls the length of the tracks. Base ISO is good.
The challenge for exposure with fireworks comes when you try to shoot more than just the fireworks themselves, like including upturned faces or the city skyline. There's even going to be a full moon low in the sky on the Fourth...if you can shoot the moon and the fireworks, fantastic, but good luck getting the exposure right....
Cheers,
b&
scottkinfw said:Here is one where I adjusted temp to left.
scottkinfw said:Here is one in about the 4 second range
scottkinfw said:I used f11 or so, iso 100 and 3 to 6 second exposures and got way different results.
I'll post a few.
TrumpetPower! said:Bulb is waaaaaay too long. You want an exposure in the range of a few to several seconds. Just as with lightning and with flash, aperture controls exposure; shutter speed controls the length of the tracks. Base ISO is good.
The challenge for exposure with fireworks comes when you try to shoot more than just the fireworks themselves, like including upturned faces or the city skyline. There's even going to be a full moon low in the sky on the Fourth...if you can shoot the moon and the fireworks, fantastic, but good luck getting the exposure right....
Cheers,
b&
scottkinfw said:Long exposure ~ 4-6 sec
scottkinfw said:Here is one where I adjusted temp to left.
scottkinfw said:Here is one in about the 4 second range
scottkinfw said:I used f11 or so, iso 100 and 3 to 6 second exposures and got way different results.
I'll post a few.
TrumpetPower! said:Bulb is waaaaaay too long. You want an exposure in the range of a few to several seconds. Just as with lightning and with flash, aperture controls exposure; shutter speed controls the length of the tracks. Base ISO is good.
The challenge for exposure with fireworks comes when you try to shoot more than just the fireworks themselves, like including upturned faces or the city skyline. There's even going to be a full moon low in the sky on the Fourth...if you can shoot the moon and the fireworks, fantastic, but good luck getting the exposure right....
Cheers,
b&
@!ex said:This was my first real attempt at shooting fireworks (with a camera). I think it came out pretty good. This was about 6-7+ exposures of anywhere from .5 sec to 15 sec. I stacked them up, and like what I was able to get. I applied what I have been learning from star trail photography to this process, and it gave me a bit more creative freedom. It is especially challenging if you want to get the right exposure on the foreground as well as the fireworks, but taking multiple exposures really is the only way to get it right.
Diamonds of Independence by @!ex, on Flickr
@!ex said:Here is what I came up with tonight. Also, there is another thread Revup started that may be a better place to post...
http://www.canonrumors.com/forum/index.php?topic=7823.0
Mile High 'Merica by @!ex, on Flickr
bdunbar79 said:@!ex said:Here is what I came up with tonight. Also, there is another thread Revup started that may be a better place to post...
http://www.canonrumors.com/forum/index.php?topic=7823.0
Mile High 'Merica by @!ex, on Flickr
Thanks, I appreciate it.
That is really cool.
Chuck Alaimo said:@!ex said:This was my first real attempt at shooting fireworks (with a camera). I think it came out pretty good. This was about 6-7+ exposures of anywhere from .5 sec to 15 sec. I stacked them up, and like what I was able to get. I applied what I have been learning from star trail photography to this process, and it gave me a bit more creative freedom. It is especially challenging if you want to get the right exposure on the foreground as well as the fireworks, but taking multiple exposures really is the only way to get it right.
Diamonds of Independence by @!ex, on Flickr
Very nice work! I am just learning the art of composite blending. Spent a while doing mainly HDR work, and I do love it but want to get away from that overly surreal look and the halos. I sense composite blending may be my next big learning assignment (along with really mastering off cam lighting)