N
Nick888 said:Please Vote.
DzPhotography said:Stupid question, the less, the better
marekjoz said:DzPhotography said:Stupid question, the less, the better
Not neccesserely
The quality and improvements have their price. Assuming base functionality and base price on 5d2 k,vel, I'd rather like to pay more and get more. I don't believe we can have more for the same price as 5d2. I'd rather like to get improvements worth additional 1000$ in comparison to 5d2 functionality and it's current price.
april said:marekjoz said:DzPhotography said:Stupid question, the less, the better
Not neccesserely
The quality and improvements have their price. Assuming base functionality and base price on 5d2 k,vel, I'd rather like to pay more and get more. I don't believe we can have more for the same price as 5d2. I'd rather like to get improvements worth additional 1000$ in comparison to 5d2 functionality and it's current price.
I'll ha ve my fingerrs crossed on this hoping that you'd be wrong. I do hope canon will drop the 5d2 price the have the 5dIII/x take overr that price position... Isn't it a better deal????
well_dunno said:May the cameras be for free and all the money to be made on lenses (of which I already have a few) ;D
cps_user said:Hard to say. For most people however I'd say: keep the 5d II and spend some $$$ on developing photo skills . I do this too and it's much more helpful than just some new stuff.
ions said:Yes, consumers who have no clue about development or manufacturing costs should set prices. Although Canon makes money on these, as cameras don't make good loss leader products, any increase in price does not mean that it's pure gravy for them. Yes, the cost of a product is considered in placing it but so are myriad other factors. Plus the idea of bitching about the cost of something that isn't even established is ridiculous to me. Same thing with the lens prices "ohh that's way too much" having never seen a single sample image... silly. No this does not mean I like paying more.