marius said:I looked to the File information in PS and I saw that this image was modified many times in:
- June 2011
- October 2011
- November 2011
If this image is a fake, then why appeared this fake not earlier in net?!
Radiating said:Honestly it just looks like someone took a photo of that lens and photoshopped it. In fact that's exactaly what happened.
Positron said:bigblue1ca said:$2300 and no IS...interesting.
I don't see any price listed in their press release or on their website. Can you link the source?
DJL329 said:Positron said:bigblue1ca said:$2300 and no IS...interesting.
I don't see any price listed in their press release or on their website. Can you link the source?
http://usa.canon.com/cusa/about_canon/newsroom?pageKeyCode=pressreldetail&docId=0901e0248044cf6e
After the 4th paragraph:
"The EF 24-70mm f/2.8L II USM lens is expected to be available in April for an approximate retail price of $2,299.00."
marius said:I looks that the II vers. is much sharper in the corners as the I vers.
I will be interesting how the new Tamron will perform. Is there a MTF Chart from the new Tamron around?
Canon 24-70 II on the left - Canon 24-70 I on the right:
![]()
LetTheRightLensIn said:marius said:I looks that the II vers. is much sharper in the corners as the I vers.
I will be interesting how the new Tamron will perform. Is there a MTF Chart from the new Tamron around?
Canon 24-70 II on the left - Canon 24-70 I on the right:
![]()
Yes the performance appears as if it may be truly stunning. For an even bigger shock compare it to lenses such as the 24 2.8 IS, 24 1.4L II, 70-200 2.8 IS II, 70-300L IS and yikes but it pretty much appears to match or beat them all! Crazy.