Hjalmarg1 said:
Sporgon said:
Just looking at the exterior pictures from the original website; the front element is a very small diameter for a 50 mm f/1.8 lens if the filter size really is 49mm. Keeping the forward elements small in diameter will help with producing a sharp image wide open at a reasonable cost, but the downside will be vignetting - I guess.
Sony has two lenses 50mm f1.8 (APS-C) and 55mm f1.8 (FF) that take 49mm filters.
The APS lens is not a fair comparison because of the image circle. The 55 lens is more sophisticated and costs about $800, certainly in the UK it's about £740. Also the front element(s) appear to be a larger diameter and its vignette isn't that bad at 1.6 stops extreme, about 1.2 average.
What I'm saying is expect this new lens to be at least as bad as the old one; more like 3 stops extreme, so twice as bad as the (expensive) Sony lens.
To me, all the signs at the moment point towards a very cheap lens: very sharp wide open but high vignette and poor 'draw'. The very sharp wide open bit will be enough for people coming from a APS kit lens or moving to FF, to see a big difference in terms of subject isolation; that is the contrast between sharp in focus and blurred out of focus.
I was
hoping that the rear elements might be radiused in such a way as to give a good 'draw' or 'render', but as this reduces overal sharpness and is very expensive to do I think it is highly unlikely.
Even with the cheaper design it could be a very effective landscaper's lens. Small diameter elements seem to be such better in this regard - sharp right to the very corners.