davidj said:
You all seem to be talking about the 6D II competing with the 5D IV, and thinking that the 6D II will have to be sufficiently nerfed to not compete with the 5D IV. Don't forget that there's a very competent Nikon D750 (and soon D760) that the 6D II will be competing directly against, so Canon can't limit the camera too much.
My wish is that the 6D II will go slightly upmarket, with it being an all-round very capable camera, just less so than the 5D IV, and the original 6D will hang around as a base model until replaced by a FF 8D (or mirrorless?).
This has been one of my angles for a long time, but apparently Canon doesn't compete with Nikon.
The 6D was much weaker than the D610 in most areas. But but but...it still sold. We've heard this ad nauseam.
D750 hits way above its weight class. Bigtime. That's the best bang for the buck FF on the market, or maybe of all time.
For a new user -- what is better? Dealing with a crippled 6D2? If not, then up selling to a 5D4 for $3,300 ..??
For $3,300 you can get both a D750 AND a D500. The D750 gives you amazing IQ, great AF, dual slots, big dynamic range. You have no shortcomings here, except maybe 1/8000 shutter... lol. And the D500 gives you 10fps, even better AF and the best crop sensor ever made.
And they can't argue that the D820 will be $3,300 also - because that's their high rez model, which is like Canon, to get high rez means a whole other $3,000+ body like the 5DS line.
Canon glass is not that much better to overcome a D500 & D750 body combo for $3,300. Incredible value and capability right there.
I hope that is enough reason for Canon to provide the 6D2 with some more up to date specs.