When Chuck Norris is shooting, the IS on his lens compensates for subject motion...if it knows what is good for it.
Upvote
0
Chuck Norris made this picture so...AcutancePhotography said:When Chuck Norris is shooting, the IS on his lens compensates for subject motion...if it knows what is good for it.
+1 agree that based on these high-Iso comparison 7DII looks very promissing.tomscott said:http://www.cameraegg.org/canon-7d-mark-ii-vs-70d-vs-d7100-high-iso-comparison/
7DMKII kicks ass
Hjalmarg1 said:+1 agree that based on these high-Iso comparison 7DII looks very promissing.tomscott said:http://www.cameraegg.org/canon-7d-mark-ii-vs-70d-vs-d7100-high-iso-comparison/
7DMKII kicks ass
Compare Canon 7D Mark II with Nikon D750 makes sense in the same way that a comparison of these cars...dash2k8 said:I would say it's not fair to compare the 7D2 to those other two. I think Canon is marketing the 7D2 in the 6D level, except for the APS-C factor. It's therefore natural that it would beat these two. I'd like to see a direct comparison between the 7D2 and the D750, for example, to see how each handles low light/shadow recovery, even if sensor sizes and crop factors are different.Hjalmarg1 said:+1 agree that based on these high-Iso comparison 7DII looks very promissing.tomscott said:http://www.cameraegg.org/canon-7d-mark-ii-vs-70d-vs-d7100-high-iso-comparison/
7DMKII kicks ass
ajfotofilmagem said:Compare Canon 7D Mark II with Nikon D750 makes sense in the same way that a comparison of these cars...dash2k8 said:I would say it's not fair to compare the 7D2 to those other two. I think Canon is marketing the 7D2 in the 6D level, except for the APS-C factor. It's therefore natural that it would beat these two. I'd like to see a direct comparison between the 7D2 and the D750, for example, to see how each handles low light/shadow recovery, even if sensor sizes and crop factors are different.Hjalmarg1 said:+1 agree that based on these high-Iso comparison 7DII looks very promissing.tomscott said:http://www.cameraegg.org/canon-7d-mark-ii-vs-70d-vs-d7100-high-iso-comparison/
7DMKII kicks ass
I think a sedan with a large interior space is more suitable for family outings, instead of a sporty two-door. Maybe someone prefers to take his family squeezed into a Camaro ??? :![]()
![]()
![]()
dash2k8 said:I did mention that I'm speaking purely about "low light/shadow recovery." If the 7D2 performs very close to the D750, that's very good for a crop sensor, wouldn't you say? I'm not talking about depth of field/lens reach/whatever, just the handling of the dark areas. It's the same way you would compare a Camaro and a Benz sedan for horsepower or comfort despite having two very different purposes. Obviously the 7D2 will trounce the D750 in sports with its faster AF, and the D750 will supposedly beat it out in low-light performance. But to say cameras with different crop factors can't be compared is like saying cars with different engines can't race against each other.
dash2k8 said:Hjalmarg1 said:+1 agree that based on these high-Iso comparison 7DII looks very promissing.tomscott said:http://www.cameraegg.org/canon-7d-mark-ii-vs-70d-vs-d7100-high-iso-comparison/
7DMKII kicks ass
I would say it's not fair to compare the 7D2 to those other two. I think Canon is marketing the 7D2 in the 6D level, except for the APS-C factor. It's therefore natural that it would beat these two. I'd like to see a direct comparison between the 7D2 and the D750, for example, to see how each handles low light/shadow recovery, even if sensor sizes and crop factors are different.