Canon EOS 7D MK II Field Review of THE APS-C DSLR KING .

AcutancePhotography said:
When Chuck Norris is shooting, the IS on his lens compensates for subject motion...if it knows what is good for it.
Chuck Norris made ​​this picture so...
canon_baseball.jpg
 
Upvote 0
Love the Chuck jokes. But I wanted to put in my $0.02 on the original topic:

If Jeff Cable says the 7D2 is for real, if a guy who shoots for the US Olympics Committee, who works closely with B&H, who teaches at universities, says it's for real, then that's good enough for me.

Now... let's hear more about Chuck!
 
Upvote 0
Hjalmarg1 said:
tomscott said:
http://www.cameraegg.org/canon-7d-mark-ii-vs-70d-vs-d7100-high-iso-comparison/

7DMKII kicks ass
+1 agree that based on these high-Iso comparison 7DII looks very promissing.

I would say it's not fair to compare the 7D2 to those other two. I think Canon is marketing the 7D2 in the 6D level, except for the APS-C factor. It's therefore natural that it would beat these two. I'd like to see a direct comparison between the 7D2 and the D750, for example, to see how each handles low light/shadow recovery, even if sensor sizes and crop factors are different.
 
Upvote 0
i think the 7dii is going to be a wonderful camera but the iq is the same as the 70d from what i have seen. the in camera conversion appears to be a bit better on the 7dii. dpr has posted raw conversions along with jpegs. they were using an early build of acr. PSA: DON'T USE ACR! the jpegs looked a lot better than the raws
 

Attachments

  • 7d2iso3200.jpg
    7d2iso3200.jpg
    238.1 KB · Views: 345
Upvote 0
dash2k8 said:
Hjalmarg1 said:
tomscott said:
http://www.cameraegg.org/canon-7d-mark-ii-vs-70d-vs-d7100-high-iso-comparison/
7DMKII kicks ass
+1 agree that based on these high-Iso comparison 7DII looks very promissing.
I would say it's not fair to compare the 7D2 to those other two. I think Canon is marketing the 7D2 in the 6D level, except for the APS-C factor. It's therefore natural that it would beat these two. I'd like to see a direct comparison between the 7D2 and the D750, for example, to see how each handles low light/shadow recovery, even if sensor sizes and crop factors are different.
Compare Canon 7D Mark II with Nikon D750 makes sense in the same way that a comparison of these cars...
I think a sedan with a large interior space is more suitable for family outings, instead of a sporty two-door. Maybe someone prefers to take his family squeezed into a Camaro ??? ::) :p
cam5-yel-matte-blk-side-accent-hash-lrg.jpg

2014-mercedes-benz-s-class-front-three-quarter.jpg
 
Upvote 0
ajfotofilmagem said:
dash2k8 said:
Hjalmarg1 said:
tomscott said:
http://www.cameraegg.org/canon-7d-mark-ii-vs-70d-vs-d7100-high-iso-comparison/
7DMKII kicks ass
+1 agree that based on these high-Iso comparison 7DII looks very promissing.
I would say it's not fair to compare the 7D2 to those other two. I think Canon is marketing the 7D2 in the 6D level, except for the APS-C factor. It's therefore natural that it would beat these two. I'd like to see a direct comparison between the 7D2 and the D750, for example, to see how each handles low light/shadow recovery, even if sensor sizes and crop factors are different.
Compare Canon 7D Mark II with Nikon D750 makes sense in the same way that a comparison of these cars...
I think a sedan with a large interior space is more suitable for family outings, instead of a sporty two-door. Maybe someone prefers to take his family squeezed into a Camaro ??? ::) :p
cam5-yel-matte-blk-side-accent-hash-lrg.jpg

2014-mercedes-benz-s-class-front-three-quarter.jpg

I did mention that I'm speaking purely about "low light/shadow recovery." If the 7D2 performs very close to the D750, that's very good for a crop sensor, wouldn't you say? I'm not talking about depth of field/lens reach/whatever, just the handling of the dark areas. It's the same way you would compare a Camaro and a Benz sedan for horsepower or comfort despite having two very different purposes. Obviously the 7D2 will trounce the D750 in sports with its faster AF, and the D750 will supposedly beat it out in low-light performance. But to say cameras with different crop factors can't be compared is like saying cars with different engines can't race against each other.
 
Upvote 0
dash2k8 said:
I did mention that I'm speaking purely about "low light/shadow recovery." If the 7D2 performs very close to the D750, that's very good for a crop sensor, wouldn't you say? I'm not talking about depth of field/lens reach/whatever, just the handling of the dark areas. It's the same way you would compare a Camaro and a Benz sedan for horsepower or comfort despite having two very different purposes. Obviously the 7D2 will trounce the D750 in sports with its faster AF, and the D750 will supposedly beat it out in low-light performance. But to say cameras with different crop factors can't be compared is like saying cars with different engines can't race against each other.


Yes I could race a formula 1 car with my family saloon but the usefulness of such an exercise would be somewhat limited and I think I know what the result would be . . . unless the F1 driver was really good of course :)
 
Upvote 0
dash2k8 said:
Hjalmarg1 said:
tomscott said:
http://www.cameraegg.org/canon-7d-mark-ii-vs-70d-vs-d7100-high-iso-comparison/

7DMKII kicks ass
+1 agree that based on these high-Iso comparison 7DII looks very promissing.

I would say it's not fair to compare the 7D2 to those other two. I think Canon is marketing the 7D2 in the 6D level, except for the APS-C factor. It's therefore natural that it would beat these two. I'd like to see a direct comparison between the 7D2 and the D750, for example, to see how each handles low light/shadow recovery, even if sensor sizes and crop factors are different.

7D2 will sorely lose, when confronted with D750. Price point means nothing and comparision to 70D and D7100 is completely valid i.e. top APS-C bodies from both manufacturers.
 
Upvote 0