I feel like you are trolling here. The M5 is a great little camera, but there are logical reasons to choose an M50 over it, which is why I did. The latter has better ergonomics, a faster CPU, a fully articulating display and was $200 less.Meanwhile everyone wants the M5 mk2 since the M50 is just so-so. Oh you love it? maybe because you never had an M5
If they fixed those things and added a couple features beyond what I listed above for an M50 successor in a new M5 Mk II, I'd certainly consider it, but for the M50 vs M5 I made that choice with intention and I'm happy with the results. But in no way do I consider the M5 a bad camera, it just didn't meet the needs I felt were most important for my goals at that time.