That doesn't look flat at all to me! Good shotThanks for the heads up. Rushed outside and did a qucik snap. Actually about 20 and I must learn how to stack them.
View attachment 188589
Upvote
0
That doesn't look flat at all to me! Good shotThanks for the heads up. Rushed outside and did a qucik snap. Actually about 20 and I must learn how to stack them.
View attachment 188589
He's PNGDont engage him. Every comment he has posted that I've seen has either been utterly absurd or pure trolling.
I was dressed up in my DJ and on the way to a reception so I just grabbed the nearest camera and telephoto and pointed it hand held at the moon with a shutter speed of about 1/1250, iso 640 and f/8. It always seems to give reasonable images with any of my various bodies and lenses.Nice shot!
I randomly decided to take some shots of the full moon last night too. I used the telescope I have and an EF adapter. Not completely sure why, but I couldn't get a completely steady shot. Not sure if it was because of my tripod, or that my balcony isn't sturdy, or because it was close to a whirring outside AC unit, but the image would hardly quit shaking.
It just reminded me how much of a pain it is to use the 5D4 for certain shots because there is no flip screen. Really looking forward to finally having a flip screen and IBIS for these kind of shots.
That doesn't look flat at all to me! Good shot
Did you not read his description? He mentioned how it was different materials from the R5 and more round than the R/RPUnderstand not wanting to post the image without permission but can you at least share how it looks. Does it look like the R or RP or is there a design change?
He did mention for you how it was different and to let you know it is for real, just wasn’t allowed to show pictures yet.So someone sent a pic and then said not to publish it?
Why even mention it then? Just for traffic I guess.
Thanks, every little bit of experience helps.Look at the very bottom edge of his photo. See the shadow in the craters? The lack of those shadow is what I mean by flat.
Now look at the ones below, where it's not a full moon. These are more interesting to look at. The shadows along the edge of day/night makes it more interesting to look at:
Anyone shooting the Snow Moon tonight? Maybe with an Ra? (Gotta stay sort of on topic) Last night the clouds parted for a few minutes and I got a couple but not with my usual moon settings as I was rushed + from a deck in the backyard of the the suburbs with light pollution.
I dont have idea ,new kind of tech maybe? just what rumours say about 1dx3 sensor.Not physically possible by all accounts?
Nice shot!
I randomly decided to take some shots of the full moon last night too. I used the telescope I have and an EF adapter. Not completely sure why, but I couldn't get a completely steady shot. Not sure if it was because of my tripod, or that my balcony isn't sturdy, or because it was close to a whirring outside AC unit, but the image would hardly quit shaking.
I don't know if I feel like braving the cold to try tonight or not. Attached image is from August 2018 using the 5Ds on a Celestron EdgeHD 8" SCT telescope which is 2032mm f/10. Not quite as sharp as I would like because of atmospheric disturbance, which may or may not be less tonight due to the cold. It's surprising just how turbulent the atmosphere usually is. Though I have had one viewing session early in the morning when the stars barely twinkled in the scope and Orion Nebula was like glass, like viewing a monitor.
Any way in JPEG this looks a bit noisy even with 'max quality' 10 compression, but the TIFF is clean. Thought I would mention that lest this start a high ISO or DR argument
View attachment 188590
That looks real sharp!
A much better example than the 2 I posted from wikipedia in my last post!
Is this going to affect the weather sealing?
Where do you see the R6 fitting in the line up. Is it going to be between the RP and the R. Or between the R and R5? Or worst case beneath the RP?
The reduced megapixels and body material has me a little worried about what kind of camera this is going to be. I need a Sony A7III but a Canon version with its specs and capabilities. Which is what I am hoping the R6 is.
I am not sure how I feel about the R6 rumors. What does lack of Magnesium Alloy body say about the Camera? Is this going to affect the weather sealing?
Is it that Canon are trying to reduce hardware cost so that they can add other great features and yet maintain reasonable price. Or are they just giving IBIS but crippling other features so that we will have to wait for R7 and R8 etc etc
Honestly, I just want an updated version of the current EOS R with IBIS, no crop 4K and Dual Slots at price that’s competitive with the A7III and Z6.
You assume EVERYONE cares about some stupid MP race. Most people do not. Especially most full time pro level users. Cuz that is the sensor from the $6500 Professional 1DX3 going into theR6.
Any way in JPEG this looks a bit noisy even with 'max quality' 10 compression, but the TIFF is clean. Thought I would mention that lest this start a high ISO or DR argument
View attachment 188590