Canon High End Mirrorless Camera Talk [CR2]

Don Haines said:
jolyonralph said:
Khalai said:
No need for protruding mount, if they keep the current form factor. Better rigidity, better handling, more space for buttons etc. As someone already pointed out, DSLR body design is ergonomically honed by decades. No need to fix something, which is not broken :)

And also, no need to have an empty box inside there. If you no longer have a mirror assembly, why not use the space for some kind of drop-down / flip down filter, eg neutral density filter?

That is a great example of both thinking outside the box, and thinking inside the box , at the same time....
+1000000000000000000000
 
Upvote 0
I might be in the minority here, but I think Canon will keep the mirror for its high end pro cameras, but use Pellicle or variable transmittance mirrors in combination with hybrid EVF/OVF, lots of patents for both elements have appeared in the last few years.
 
Upvote 0
Meatcurry said:
I might be in the minority here, but I think Canon will keep the mirror for its high end pro cameras, but use Pellicle or variable transmittance mirrors in combination with hybrid EVF/OVF, lots of patents for both elements have appeared in the last few years.

Hope not another SLT like the Sony A mount cameras. I had the A99, don't want another one made by Canon :)
 
Upvote 0