Canon hit by Maze Ransomware attack, 10TB data allegedly stolen
- Thread starter Canon Rumors Guy
- Start date
As of a few years ago, they shouldn’t, I used to have suppliers for classic car parts where I could ring up and order bits without giving card details, that all went away (and probably rightly so) in favour of security.
Cheers, Graham.
Cheers, Graham.
by an ID. usually the card gateway ie: a company like authorize.net stores the card # etc but that's validated and approved by visa, etc. the end company ie: a canon or ie: me or anyone just gets a generic "id". now if a hacker ever broke into authorize.net or a large payment gateway ... wow, it'd be hell.
Alot of that depends though on your transactional volume as welll, different rules apply, but most likely it's fine. but always keep an eye on yourcard.
btw, even a charge going on your card doesn't necessarily8 mean you were hacked, stolen, etc - wells fargo told me that at times the card readers at the store, get the combination right on the numbers and accidentally get "wrong" numbers during the swipe - faulty reader,etc.
Wow.. I had just posted last week wondering if their cloud based storage outage was ransomware related. Days later it actually happened. First Garmin, now Canon. A whole rash of ransomware hacks this year...
I am thinking this is way worse than is being announced. The store is STILL down.
They get a pre-authorization and store the transaction's authorization number rather than the card number.
It doesn't matter what OS you're running when stupid employees click on links designed to entice them to be unable to resist clicking on it.
Too many people can't help themselves and will open emails with a title like "Your FedEx shipment rescheduled" even when they haven't ordered anything.
Yes. I order a lot of stuff online and am always worried about malware. I've added some filters to my email that do a good job of removing scams, but every month or two, I spot one that got thru. When they get personal data with names and emails, they can craft more convincing fake emails, so its a matter of time before they get me. I have backups on my NAS as well as removable drive and Snapshots stored in a supposedly secure area of the NAS that is not susceptible to locking. I also am in the process of backing up the snapshots, I had to get a 2nd compatible NAS and the hard drives are not here yet. Large hard drives get expensive when you need several.
Canon has been pretty silent, but it is obviously very bad. They have brought some things back up.
Yes. Trying to buy through Canon’s site with your CC can be a pain. Several years ago I bought a 100-400vII, because I had a nice discount code from Canon. It ended up taking about 3-4 days at least to make the purchase. After I’d complete the transaction, I’d get a email from Canon hours to a day later saying that they had cancelled it(lens was in-stock). I of course checked with my CC company and there were no issues and they weren’t blocking it. After several attempts on-line, I finally ended up having to make the purchase over the phone with a CSR.
The same purchase from B&H would have taken maybe 30-60 seconds and I would have had the lens in-hand in less time than it ultimately took to just complete the order. But of course the discount code was only for a direct purchase from Canon.
I know....the sites are still down and they are just “working on things”..... Corporations don’t just “work on websites for days”. I think the whole ordering system has been hit with the ransomware.
Newsday has the first "mainstream" media report i have seen on the situation. They apparently have an official response from Canon, confirming the ransomware attack.
Canon U.S.A. hit by ransomware attack
Canon U.S.A. Inc., one of Long Island’s largest employers, suffered a cyberattack that knocked out some computer systems, a company spokeswoman confirmed Friday. “Access to some Canon systems is curre
www.newsday.com
Why do they think hiding and not saying anything is a good move?Newsday has the first "mainstream" media report i have seen on the situation. They apparently have an official response from Canon, confirming the ransomware attack.
Canon U.S.A. hit by ransomware attack
Canon U.S.A. Inc., one of Long Island’s largest employers, suffered a cyberattack that knocked out some computer systems, a company spokeswoman confirmed Friday. “Access to some Canon systems is currewww.newsday.com
Nikon’s unbelievable silence on the 70-200 2.8 z lens is why I have left them for Canon and here Canon sits silently.
I am surprised Canonrumors Isn’t getting some dirt on this as well
Security people checking out the intrusion do not want details leaked until they have totally gone thru everything on the network. It gives hackers clues just by letting them know what and when the issue was discovered. If a hacker knows your capabilities, they can mitigate some of them, so it is a matter of concealing what you know from the enemy or from other potential intruders.
Eventually, some info will trickle out.
Eventually, some info will trickle out.
A Canon coder was working on the firmware to fix the crippled overheating issue but didn't know another coder put in a hidden "Self Destruct" in case the firmware fix got implemented and BOOM!!! - this happens!
I hoped so too but it's now onto 'Day 8' or so, crazy! The Federal Government needs to create a task force to go after these guys, you'd think they could track these guys down and make THEM pay for their crimes! Well, once back up there may be a bunch of bargains in the 'refurb bin'!
Generally they are either overseas, or hiding behind an overseas corporation in some third world country that doesn't give a damn.
That's true of the spam callers too. In that case, even with some US company's involvement, what happens is the FCC fines them a million dollars for breaking the robocall regs, the company declares bankruptcy so it doesn't have to pay anything...and a week later a new company is set up. The people committing the fraud are overseas somewhere and part of a different shell corporation, so the US company is only on the hook for violating FCC regulations.
