• The Canon Rumors Forum has officially been shut down as of July 10, 2026.

    All data will be deleted on September 16, 2026.

    the ad free experience will return by July 17, 2026.

Canon officially announces the Canon PowerShot ZOOM

I noticed this as well. I'm sure its supposed to be .39 inch. If it were true, it would be bigger then my living room TV! XD

When I owned a rental property I could truthfully tell the tenants that their TVs (often well over 60 inches) were bigger than mine. That did a lot to convince them I wasn't made of money, because they couldn't imagine someone who had money not having the biggest TV they could buy.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Upvote 0
Just pre-ordered two of these little buggers.

It's not like I've ever been left standing on a dark, dreary street corner in the rain by a Canon pre-order before, right? If the release date is in November I'm bound to have it by bikini season.

:ROFLMAO:
 
  • Haha
Reactions: 1 users
Upvote 0
It's intriguing and a nice way of keeping compact cameras relevant in the face of smartphones, but I have to say the image quality of sample photos on DPR were disappointing - and I don't enjoy being negative. Still, for record shots of birds it could be an alternative to phonescoping.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users
Upvote 0
I've been watching for an alternative to heavy and expensive image stabilized binoculars for a trip to Costa Rica that I hope to reschedule some day. This could be it.
In the '80s when Halley's Comet was around, I would go out at view it through my binoculars. Then I would look at other things. I looked at Jupiter one night and saw three little dots that I confirmed from a chart that they really were 3 of the moons.

I'm obviously much older now, but I don't think of myself as being a lot shakier. The other night I took the binoculars out and looked at Jupiter. I couldn't hold the binoculars steady enough to see the planet well, much less see any of its moons. It is just a 7x, not anything high powered.

I don't know if this would help me.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Upvote 0
In the '80s when Halley's Comet was around, I would go out at view it through my binoculars. Then I would look at other things. I looked at Jupiter one night and saw three little dots that I confirmed from a chart that they really were 3 of the moons.

I'm obviously much older now, but I don't think of myself as being a lot shakier. The other night I took the binoculars out and looked at Jupiter. I couldn't hold the binoculars steady enough to see the planet well, much less see any of its moons. It is just a 7x, not anything high powered.

I don't know if this would help me.


I bought my dear wife a pair of Canon image stabilized binoculars a couple of years ago and they are fantastic and a complete game changer.

They work normally until you press a little button and then IS kicks in and boy oh boy are they nice.

Just a thought.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 users
Upvote 0
My question was answered by the hands on review at DPR. It definitely has its limitations and a later version may iron out some of the interface issues. The battery is non removable, so maybe a trip to Canon when it dies?

 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Upvote 0
My question was answered by the hands on review at DPR. It definitely has its limitations and a later version may iron out some of the interface issues. The battery is non removable, so maybe a trip to Canon when it dies?

I would guess you are meant to buy a new one if you manage to use the device so much that the battery actually becomes unusable.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Upvote 0
I would guess you are meant to buy a new one if you manage to use the device so much that the battery actually becomes unusable.
Typically, Lion batteries don't become unusable, they fade away. A new one has 150 CIPA shots claimed, so the question is when does it drop to a life of say 100 shots? Life of a Lion battery is said to be when it reaches 70% capacity. How many would a person need before a 2 hour recharge?

If you don't use it, the battery dies even quicker. Batteries reduce in capacity as a function of recharges (300-500 typical life) and time. So, in 2-3 years, the likelihood of a dead or greatly reduced capacity is to the point that enough will need batteries to make it significant. I have a number of electronic gadgets that need new batteries after 3 years. I would not buy a device that needed replacement after 3 years or even 5 just because the battery was dead. There must be a way to replace it. Likely, it will be a $100 charge from Canon. Maybe I should sell every 2 years and get a new one? My credit card offers a additional year of warranty so I'm covered for 2 years.

I wear a Cochlear implant which uses Li-on batteries. They fully discharge and must be recharged every day. They fit demonstrate the validity of the 300 recharge cycle range for smaller batteries nicely, I need a new one every year. They will keep going for much longer, but the capacity continues to drop so eventually a charge just lasts just 2 or 3 hours and that is impractical. The battery in the Canon device is not going to be fully discharged and recharged every day, so 500 charges might take 10-50 years if it weren't for the tendency to fail over time as well. I'd bet that around 25% will need batteries in 5 years. By then, of course, the value of the camera may very well be less than the cost to repair it.

There is a very good article about life of Li-on batteries here:

 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Upvote 0
Its not clear, but it may operate with either a PD or a standard 5V 3A charger. A 1.5A will charge it but not run the camera.

Canon's charger is priced out of sight. I have the Canon one that came with my Grip for my R(it might be worth more than the grip! I also have a inexpensive Anker. Its good to see that Canon also mentions it.

Apparently, it will charge from a standard 2 amp USB charger, its not so clear.

You can shoot while connected to a charger, so a power bank might give a long battery life or even be used when the battery loses most of its capacity. I assume you could charge from one while traveling. It sounds like operation from a PD supply is similar to my R5.

I always wonder how many PD-E1 adapters they will sell at $190. Its in the list of accessories.


charger.JPGcharger specs.JPG
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0
My old binoculars don't have a way to hook to a tripod that I know of. Maybe I could use duct tape. That's the usual fix here in the South for anything that isn't fixed by WD-40.

I would hope you don't just try WD-40 first then go to duct tape. The algorithm is "If it's doesn't move enough, WD-40, if moves too much, duct tape."
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users
Upvote 0