Canon Patent Application: Canon RF 35mm F1.4 and 26mm F1.4

P-visie

EOS 5 - R5
Canon Rumors Premium
Sep 14, 2020
168
285
Netherlands
www.p-visie.nl
Could be. But normally Canon would round this up to the "better side".
A 382mm tele will become a "400mm".
A 26 mm WA will become a "24 mm".
We'll see, what patent will come to live at all.
The difference in field of view between a 26+ mm lens and a 24 mm lens is substantial, I doubt if they could get away with calling a 26+ mm lens a 24 mm lens. But the lens(es) from this patent application may never see the light of day.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users
Upvote 0

Maximilian

The dark side - I've been there
Canon Rumors Premium
Nov 7, 2013
5,783
8,872
Germany
The difference in field of view between a 26+ mm lens and a 24 mm lens is substantial, I doubt if they could get away with calling a 26+ mm lens a 24 mm lens. But the lens(es) from this patent application may never see the light of day.
I know, but I don't know what Canon is thinking here ;)
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users
Upvote 0

Del Paso

M3 Singlestroke
Canon Rumors Premium
Aug 9, 2018
3,475
4,478
An RF 35mm f/1.4 L Macro USM with no focus breathing and a size similar to the EF 35mm f/1.4L II? Sign me up!
No chance at all.
F/1,4 and macro? A guarantee for poor macro results!
If you need to be convinced, just put your EF 1,4/35 on an extension tube.
But I agree, theoretically, it would be nice if it worked.
 
Upvote 0

koenkooi

Canon Rumors Premium
Feb 25, 2015
3,725
4,377
The Netherlands
No chance at all.
F/1,4 and macro? A guarantee for poor macro results!
If you need to be convinced, just put your EF 1,4/35 on an extension tube.
But I agree, theoretically, it would be nice if it worked.
I bet Canon can fix that, but not without adding €1000 or so to the price.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Upvote 0