Admit it. You were wrong. I was right.
I’m not the one who’s pathologically unable to admit mistakes. Where did I say the OC-E4A wasn’t announced, such that I could be wrong about that? Spoiler: I didn’t. What I said was:
Was the OC-E4A actually announced? It has appeared for preorder, but I didn’t notice Canon saying anything about it.
See how that’s a question, not a statement? The issue was that your first answer to the question was not satisfactory. That’s on you. Then, when I challenged your inadequate answer for not addressing ‘Canon saying anything about it’, you did more digging and discovered an actual announcement
by Canon. Then, I replied:
Thanks for the PRs from Canon UK, that’s an actual announcement.
So what should I admit here, that after a failed attempt you were able to correctly answer a question? Yes, I admit that you were right answering my question, at least on the second try. Well done, and thanks again for the information.