I'm excited by "Filter Type: RGBIR" as a kind of filter... is that RGB+infrared?
Many have been saying "we don't need more than 20-25MP" and yet the 45MP sensors have absolutely acceptable sensitivity, noise and dynamic range for many shooters and most shooting.
Back in the 90s, I had the idea for a filter that instead of the traditional R/G/G/B 2x2 checkerboard (with double green channel as it's most important to human vision so the biggest payoff when it's lower noise), that R/B/B/G would make more sense as it'd get you double blue sensitivity in the lowest light, where blue is usually the weakest and where lower noise would most matter.
I also thought a larger checkerboard with 2-3 IR channels would make sense. The camera could then shoot as color infrared or have a choice of channels for B&W infrared. Perhaps each pixel could be a 3x3 checkerboard with 2xR, 2xG, 2xB, then one each of the IR frequencies.
I also though an unfiltered (and thus very substantially better sensitivity) White channel that would have an out-sized role to play in setting pixel brightness. I think the color filter probably rejects 80% of the light coming to the sensor or something, so if so, a R/G/B/White 2x2 filter array would give about twice the total brightness information of a four-filter array.
Finally while on the subject, you could also expand the number of primaries significantly. An 8-primary system would be able to capture 99% of the colors humans can see vs. the current 40% or something (though to be fair the current RGB standard still captures a large majority of the colors we actually see in the world around us; the other colors are rare outside of rainbows, glints in gemstones and so on, but still, there has to be SOME market for a camera that can capture a far greater range of visible color...)