Is it just me, or does the Canon not smoke the Panasonic on image quality in this review? The reviewer is touting the constant f/2.8 aperture throughout it's 24x (600mm) range, and granted that does give nicer background blur/subject separation, and of course that can give higher shutter speed and all...BUT. He never talks about the IQ differences in his own comparison shots.
http://www.cameralabs.com/reviews/Panasonic_Lumix_DMC_FZ200/
It just seems like from his shots anyway that the Canon gives much sharper images.
http://www.cameralabs.com/reviews/Panasonic_Lumix_DMC_FZ200/
It just seems like from his shots anyway that the Canon gives much sharper images.
