MichaelTheMaven said:
Focusing systems are dominant, and I believe that Canon may have inadvertently killed the 70D with this. Love the ISO performance, face tracking is excellent.
Thanks for the video!
When I saw the specs of the 760, I had a similar thought - hmm, is a 70D even worth it? Still, I'd like to see more tests between the 760 and 70D before I come to any conclusions. Dual pixel should still be better, but if the 760 is good enough? If this AF III is plenty fine for the kind of video most people want to shoot - I'd say the 70D is dead.
With technology ever increasing, and in this day and age of DSLR's - what exactly is the point of having a premium line of APS-C cameras anymore? That concept might be obsolete. A single line of consumer-level APS-C cameras at $1,100 or less ought to have all the features and quality possible in what used to be a premium APS-C camera. I'd love to see the Rebel line just get better to the point of eliminating the need for premium APS-C bodies. This will mean we, the consumer, get more features and quality for a lower price. As it should be in the tech-world.
With entry level FF being priced very well now, and pros and others wanting larger bodies - it is hard to see why anyone would want to spend $1,400 or more on an APS-C camera (that's what the 70D sold for). That is an absurdly high amount. Better ergonomics, bigger bodies is definitely something - but why bother putting crop sensors in these larger bodies anymore? The 7D2 is the odd-ball, appealing to users not for it's sensor or IQ, but for it's very high FPS and awesome AF. That is a specialists camera, and the only one of its kind.
It makes me wonder if there will ever be a 80D? It is probably time for the industry to say good bye to overly expensive, premium APS-C bodies, and just replace that segment with entry level FF. This seems to be happening anyway - at least in the Nikon world.
I personally see more people on the entry level shooting Nikon. Nikon runs the TV commercial for the D3300 and D5300. I see more Nikons around people's necks at parks, the beach and anywhere else. I can't remember the last time I saw a rebel. I can see why - the Nikon's have a very impressive sensor and features for the price. The 24MP sensor they pack is no joke at all. That is a lot of IQ for the money. Huge value. There's also the marketing factor. The minimally informed buyer sees 18mp vs 24mp and that is probably 75% or more of the buying decision right there. Canon can now match this - but not for price unfortunately. The D3300 is still sporting a killer sensor and it's $500 or less.
For those who dig in more - the video AF features is the key here. For the enthusiasts, it will be great to have that kind of focus in a cheaper body. For the average consumer - finally being able to take decent video with a DSLR is huge as these users seek multi-use, multi-purpose devices for vacations, children etc...
While your video is not a 760 vs 70D heads up battle - based on what it shows of the 760, I'd have to agree, the 70D is dead.