If it was a 10log function, then it would be 31 stops, but this is power and for that we use a 20log function and we end up with almost 16 stops.....davidmurray said:Don Haines said:CanonGuy said:davidmurray said:drmikeinpdx said:davidmurray said:I'd also expect to see lots of cheap, virtually unsalable older models - including my own 5D3.
I'm sure my 5D3 will be thoroughly worn out by then! Best purchase I ever made.![]()
I too am very happy with my 5D3.
It's just that 92dB is massively massively huge dynamic range. It would permanently wipe the smile off the Sony fan-bois.
Such a dynamic range would be difficult if not impossible to print without significant compression of that range.
Much like digital sequencers, synthesizers, and recorders did away with the need to be skillful in playing music and capturing the sound, so too will a 92dB DR camera do away with the need to consider the amount of light on different parts of the subject.
You are cute to think that others will just sit back lol. Canon is miles behind DR wise. Let them play the catch up game first lol
93 dB would be 16 stops..... Yes, it is better, but it is not revolutionary better.
More like 30 stops - if one stop is a doubling of light.
Upvote
0