- Status
paul13walnut5 said:
Hey Paulie, I did download it but have yet to try it, it almost looks like Cinestyle but a little less drastic. I haven't seen any LUTs specifically for it, and they are usually pretty vocal about those when they are available. From what I can tell the changes aren't big enough to warrant having a LUT for it. I'm going to try it out in the future, I've just been so wrapped up in the ML raw I haven't had a chance to mess with it. Hope all is well overseas buddy!
Upvote
0
Fyi: raw video is available on all cameras, it's just that the older ones like 7d are limited to the 1728 horizontal resolution and have a max. datarate of 20mb/s ...paul13walnut5 said:
... for 30fps at 1728x1152 you are at 100MB/s, at the more reasonable 1280x720 (16:9) still 46MB/s, so you need to lower the res to for example 768x512 (3:2) for continuous recording, otherwise you're just getting short clips when the buffer is full.
paul13walnut5 said:
For further information & workflow tools see here: http://www.magiclantern.fm/forum/index.php?topic=5247.0
Upvote
0
paul13walnut5 said:
Data rate seems to be around 100-120mbps, using a Komputerbay 64GB and can run it for 5 minutes straight with 0 skipped frames, so that's pretty sweet. I've experimented with pretty much all the available software people have made recently (raw2dng, RAWanizer, etc.). I tried Rawanizer which is supposed to give you Cineform .mov files but have been having trouble with that. So as of now I've just been doing a workflow similar to the BMCC, convert the .RAW to cinema DNG's, process those using Camera Raw, export to TIFF, bring into FCPX, export as prores, edit that. I haven't actually gone any further than processing them with Camera Raw, just been experimenting and haven't really shot anything with the intent of editing it.
I have to say it's insane how much you can do in post, night and day better in terms of flexibility. I had some shots with the sky blown out and as soon as I pulled down that highlight slider I was absolutely floored, the sky came right back and looked outstanding with virtually no degrading of the image! It's very cool, bit cumbersome at the moment, but I think once they get the kinks worked out it will be a very viable option.
Upvote
0
P
paul13walnut5
Guest
Cool. I'm a bit scared to run ML on my 7D, given it's current problems, I saw the X-video as maybe being a way to get another look without breaking anything (I know, I know, ML is by sheer mathematics of users / failures ratio, safe) also I only have 4TB in my RAID, which will zap with renders etc..
What computer hardware are folk using?
& back to question, is anybody using x-video? Are there LUTs for it?
Cheers
What computer hardware are folk using?
& back to question, is anybody using x-video? Are there LUTs for it?
Cheers
Upvote
0
paul13walnut5 said:
I know, but we'll convert you to a believer still
... but for production you should wait until the 7d and raw_rec video are out of alpha, currently it's changing every day: https://bitbucket.org/hudson/magic-lantern/commits/all/
Upvote
0
paul13walnut5 said:
Yeah a RAID 0 setup is important. I had started out with non-RAID, USB 2.5
(USB 3.0 card in a PCI slot running at only partial USB 3.0 speed) and it was slow. Now a 4TB RAID 0 hooked up over USB 3.0 and that helped a TON.I also bumped up to an i7 3770 with some fast memory to help out even a bit more (had AMD x940 before).
Upvote
0
- Status
