Yes! Look at Infiniti cars now - what a disaster from a company that's trying to build brands against companies that feature the 3 series, E Class, etc.AprilForever said:RLPhoto said:I like the name 7D. It's so cheerful and full of vigor. ::
:
![]()
I feel the same way. Names are deeply meaningful, and just changing them for stupid corporate reasons cheapens them.
Don Haines said:RLPhoto said:I like the name 7D. It's so cheerful and full of vigor. ::
:
![]()
I hear that it will be named the Mephitidae Mephitis and that the only new feature will be a mode dial that goes all the way around![]()
I live in China(same ideas about the meaning of 4 or "si") and this is not as big of a deal as people make it out to be. Nikon already has a D4 as their flagship. My building(and most others) have a 4th floor. My apartment is #4..... etc.Zv said:Names we'll prob never see from Canon -
4D - four also reads as death in Japanese.
8D - 2 x 4 = 8 still a multiple of four. Superstition may keep this name at bay! Also sounds like you're saying 80.
I think this is spot on. If Canon wants to make the end all be all of APS-C cameras(which I believe is what they should do) they will probably want to position it well over 2000 dollars. A new, higher level name will facilitate this better than a simple "II" designation.pwp said:A valid marketing reason to ship the premium APS-C offering with a new name is this. If the new camera is a feature-laden as we hope, it's going to need a higher pricepoint. To name a significantly higher priced release as the 7DII will elicit howls of protest."Look how much they've raised the price of the 7D!!!"
But if it's skillfully repositioned as an all new model, the grounds for grumbling will be lessened. The 7D classic may even soldier on for another couple of years...who knows? It's still a very good camera which has aged remarkably well.
-pw
slclick said:mkabi said:slclick said:...7D was/is a stills shooter body first and foremost....
So you think the 7D and the 5D mark ii was popularized b/c it was a still body first and foremost?
Well I have no idea where you pulled the 5D2 comment from since my post had no mention but as for the 7D I was not speaking of popularity but of features such as an advanced AF system for still photography. Mainly sports. Do you have a different opinion?
MrPeevee said:posted by CW: http://www.canonwatch.com/another-tidbit-eos-7d-mark-ii-rumor-aps-c-flagship-set-come/
. . . there will be a high-end APS-C DSLR but not with the '7D' in the name.
Zv said:Slight off topic thinking out loud.
Names we'll prob never see from Canon -
2D - can you imagine a 2D2? Sounds too much like a star wars character.
3D - do we need special glasses or what? Also too close to nintendo 3DS.
4D - four also reads as death in Japanese.
8D - 2 x 4 = 8 still a multiple of four. Superstition may keep this name at bay! Also sounds like you're saying 80.
10D - we already had it. Could make a comeback though.
You can see why they chose 1, 5, 6 and 7 now. Maybe they're runnin out of numbers?
I really hope they don't use random made up words instead!
except for the lack of AFMA, the 60D was a fine camera.... note that AFMA is back on the 70D... apparantly Canon listens...dstppy said:If it's being renamed, it's probably going to be a 50D -> 60D scenario, unfortunately.
7D MarkII, on the name alone, will draw people in since it's a known quantity.
But if you look at the 50D -> 60D change . . . was there anything wrong with the 60D? No.
How many posts have there been about 'no metal body' and 'no mfa'? A billion.
What was wrong with the release? Expectations.
If the 60D had been named it a Kiss PRO or a 600D PRO, people would have complained about something else . . . the 7D could have been the 60D and (from the huge price difference) they could have sold both.
Don Haines said:except for the lack of AFMA, the 60D was a fine camera.... note that AFMA is back on the 70D... apparantly Canon listens...