for static subjects, even I might not see enough benefits.It's also very expensive and a huge hurdle that many will decide is not worth the cost because there just aren't enough benefits.
Upvote
0
for static subjects, even I might not see enough benefits.It's also very expensive and a huge hurdle that many will decide is not worth the cost because there just aren't enough benefits.
David_B said:
It's also very expensive and a huge hurdle that many will decide is not worth the cost because there just aren't enough benefits.
Even for static portraiture, a mirrorless will hit focus on the eye more frequently than a DSLR.for static subjects, even I might not see enough benefits.
for manual focus on static subjects, i do like the r5 focus assist -- super cool. but a test shot or two and check focus on the mag-ed in image on the back screen (or better yet in the studio an attached monitor) does fine also.Even for static portraiture, a mirrorless will hit focus on the eye more frequently than a DSLR.
And mirrorless is much better if you use manual focus lenses (e.g. TS)
But I do agree that each one needs to decide whether the pros outweigh the cons (costs mainly) for their photography
I traded in my 5D4 past Saturday for an R5 II. Time was ripe, I decided after using my R7 extensively since it came out... That said, I got a lot of nice BIF shots even with 6 fps only with my old 5D3, because it was the first camera I had in my hands that delivered reliable in-focus shots with my vintage EF 500mm f/4.5 (plus 1.4x TC III). But in many settings modern ML cameras with animal/ eye AF are superior, e.g. with vivid backgrounds or if a bird sits deeply in a bush and you want it tack sharp aiming through a hole in the branches...i stuck with 5D4 and its 7 fps until R5 arrived
true... assuming that you have time and that you trust the back screen (an attached monitor would be best of course)for manual focus on static subjects, i do like the r5 focus assist -- super cool. but a test shot or two and check focus on the mag-ed in image on the back screen (or better yet in the studio an attached monitor) does fine also.
Difficult to interpret, that's true...
Seems, that built-in lens cameras are gaining ground, because people recognize, that cell phone cameras cannot handle everything.
But ILC are still too big for those people, Vloggers, etc.
Or Russia, or China, or a lot of other countries.Typically only if they're traveling to the USA.
Yes, I would never take my usual Iphone to the USA, fearing a Homeland Security MAGA could read some of my posts or Whatsapp messages about you guess what or whom...Typically only if they're traveling to the USA.
North Korea, China, Russia and the USA on the same list. Isn't this sheer madness?Or Russia, or China, or a lot of other countries.
The reality of my own experiences coming in and out of the USA is that it’s extremely unlikely they’ll want to see your phone. It’s never happened to me, my wife, or anyone else on line near me, so I think it’s pretty safe. But the problem is that you can’t be 100% certain. We’ll see what happens with everything when the orange man is gone.North Korea, China, Russia and the USA on the same list. Isn't this sheer madness?