Different tools for different trades

Status
Not open for further replies.
Dec 6, 2011
170
0
6,166
Let's all take a deep breath and accept that some camera manufacturers have great sensors, while some manufacturers have great JPG engines. Let's all also accept that some camera manufacturers show progress by having high megapixel and high ISO cameras in one body, while some manufacturers have great JPG engines.

It is just a matter of taste and style. Some manufacturers introduce a new high megapixel body with 50% more resolution with price cut by 3-times from its previous high megapixel body, while some manufacturers have great JPG engines.

Different tools for different trades. What matters is how we use the tool.
 
poias said:
Let's all take a deep breath and accept that some camera manufacturers have great sensors, while some manufacturers have great JPG engines. Let's all also accept that some camera manufacturers show progress by having high megapixel and high ISO cameras in one body, while some manufacturers have great JPG engines.

It is just a matter of taste and style. Some manufacturers introduce a new high megapixel body with 50% more resolution with price cut by 3-times from its previous high megapixel body, while some manufacturers have great JPG engines.

Different tools for different trades. What matters is how we use the tool.

Absolutely true
 
Upvote 0
You could end up with a camera version of this...a Canikonybladasonic?

It's a car created by an insurance company.
https://carcreation.nrma.com.au/carBuild.html

PW
 

Attachments

  • crazycar.jpg
    crazycar.jpg
    18.3 KB · Views: 1,318
Upvote 0
poias said:
Let's all take a deep breath and accept that some camera manufacturers have great sensors, while some manufacturers have great JPG engines. Let's all also accept that some camera manufacturers show progress by having high megapixel and high ISO cameras in one body, while some manufacturers have great JPG engines.

It is just a matter of taste and style. Some manufacturers introduce a new high megapixel body with 50% more resolution with price cut by 3-times from its previous high megapixel body, while some manufacturers have great JPG engines.

Different tools for different trades. What matters is how we use the tool.

The last line is true. As for the rest of your post...

images
 
Upvote 0
poias said:
Let's all take a deep breath and accept that some camera manufacturers have great sensors, while some manufacturers have great JPG engines. Let's all also accept that some camera manufacturers show progress by having high megapixel and high ISO cameras in one body, while some manufacturers have great JPG engines.

It is just a matter of taste and style.

yap and some camera manufacters are dependant for their sensors from a collapsing company and their 3000$ cameras are slower than 600$ cameras of competition :D
 
Upvote 0
davidson said:
Seriously?? was this post really necessary?? such a waste of time trying to incite a flame war over a topic that should have burnt out by now....

-1

No matter this topic will incite a flame war or not, people have their right to post whatever they want to post. If you see something you don't agree, you can reply to them or just ignore them.
 
Upvote 0
aznable said:
poias said:
Let's all take a deep breath and accept that some camera manufacturers have great sensors, while some manufacturers have great JPG engines. Let's all also accept that some camera manufacturers show progress by having high megapixel and high ISO cameras in one body, while some manufacturers have great JPG engines.

It is just a matter of taste and style.

yap and some camera manufacters are dependant for their sensors from a collapsing company and their 3000$ cameras are slower than 600$ cameras of competition :D

Don't for get 5D3 is slower than my 7D.
 
Upvote 0
cliffwang said:
Don't for get 5D3 is slower than my 7D.

yap and it's slower than my 50D...we won ;)

i miss the times when canonians was screaming for every bump of megapixels in newly announced sensors…now they are screaming for the opposite; just ridicolous
(but i get a lot of fun)
 
Upvote 0
aznable said:
yap and it's slower than my 50D...we won ;)

i miss the times when canonians was screaming for every bump of megapixels in newly announced sensors…now they are screaming for the opposite; just ridicolous
(but i get a lot of fun)
Why ridiculous? When people complain bad 50mm F/1.4 and 24-70mm L, many people still enjoy their 50mm F/1.4 and 24-70mm L. 10% of people got bad copies will make BIG BIG noise. That will make you feel most of those lenses are bad. My 24-70mm is soft, but two of my friends' 24-70mm are very sharp.
Now you can see many Canon users want high MP cameras after Canon is testing the high MP camera or I should say after Nikon release 36MP camera.
Everyone is different. They have different needs. Sometimes people keep silent doesn't meant they agree or disagree. Dose that make sense?
 
Upvote 0
cliffwang said:
Why ridiculous? When people complain bad 50mm F/1.4 and 24-70mm L, many people still enjoy their 50mm F/1.4 and 24-70mm L. 10% of people got bad copies will make BIG BIG noise. That will make you feel most of those lenses are bad. My 24-70mm is soft, but two of my friends' 24-70mm are very sharp.
Now you can see many Canon users want high MP cameras after Canon is testing the high MP camera or I should say after Nikon release 36MP camera.
Everyone is different. They have different needs. Sometimes people keep silent doesn't meant they agree or disagree. Dose that make sense?

it's ridicolous because are the same people that complained about the bump in mpix that now area complaing about too few mpix.

in the past the word was that 12mpix is enough but now 22mpix stinks..lol.

anyway i was thinking about change the 50D with another camera mainly to improve the AF performance and i am undecided between 1dmk3 and 7D (shooted some sport and airshow recently)... can you give me some advice
 
Upvote 0
aznable said:
it's ridicolous because are the same people that complained about the bump in mpix that now area complaing about too few mpix.

in the past the word was that 12mpix is enough but now 22mpix stinks..lol.

anyway i was thinking about change the 50D with another camera mainly to improve the AF performance and i am undecided between 1dmk3 and 7D (shooted some sport and airshow recently)... can you give me some advice

Everyone is different. I can tell you I love 22MP on my 5D2 more than 18MP on my 7D. More MP can have more details. Again everyone is different. Nothing wrong with people like low MP with high ISO or high MP with ISO 800-.
I don't have 1D3, so I cannot tell you if how good 1D3 is. I just sold my 7D because I see the rumor Canon is going to have HIGH MP low price FF. Now it time to clean some of my gears. However, 7D is great. When I taking photos for my son with 70-200mm in high FPS mode, I think about 60-70% of focus is accurate. Of cause he is still not running very fast, but still fast. That's very difficult to take my son's photo outside with my 5D2.
Are you really consider 7D? Why don't you wait for 70D or 7D2?
 
Upvote 0
cliffwang said:
I just sold my 7D because I see the rumor Canon is going to have HIGH MP low price FF.

You made a decision like that based on a rumor? :o I hope that you sold it because you no longer use/need it - CR rumors, especially for things like a high MP / low price FF body (an oxymoron for Canon, I think), are not a good guide for buying/selling decisions...
 
Upvote 0
neuroanatomist said:
cliffwang said:
I just sold my 7D because I see the rumor Canon is going to have HIGH MP low price FF.

You made a decision like that based on a rumor? :o I hope that you sold it because you no longer use/need it - CR rumors, especially for things like a high MP / low price FF body (an oxymoron for Canon, I think), are not a good guide for buying/selling decisions...

I think you just got trolled... :P
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.