EF 14mm f/1.4L USM
- Thread starter dolina
- Start date
For stills, not so much, considering the cost.
For anything cinema, yes -- please. It drives me nuts when the light of a set works with F/2.0 or F/1.4 or T/... for that matter (filming on location in, e.g., a bar for a music video and no budget for light) and then no way to go wider.
I guess to make that happen, we would see easily a $4-$6K figure for that, which might be more of a prestige object for Canon than a good sales investment. Just a wild guess.
For anything cinema, yes -- please. It drives me nuts when the light of a set works with F/2.0 or F/1.4 or T/... for that matter (filming on location in, e.g., a bar for a music video and no budget for light) and then no way to go wider.
I guess to make that happen, we would see easily a $4-$6K figure for that, which might be more of a prestige object for Canon than a good sales investment. Just a wild guess.
Upvote
0
So long as it was sharp and the coma was good, this would be a brilliant astro lens.
I've often wondered by there aren't really any lenses that are faster than 2.8 while wider than 24mm, primes or otherwise. I know it's probably a niche market and it would probably cost a fair bit, but the fact that there are few, if any, offerings does have me scratching my head a little. Even an f/2 would be nice. *shrugs*
I've often wondered by there aren't really any lenses that are faster than 2.8 while wider than 24mm, primes or otherwise. I know it's probably a niche market and it would probably cost a fair bit, but the fact that there are few, if any, offerings does have me scratching my head a little. Even an f/2 would be nice. *shrugs*
Upvote
0
Don't get excited, it's the 24mm as indicated on other shots in the series.
They never had a 14mm on the shoot.
They never had a 14mm on the shoot.
Upvote
0
