JohanCruyff said:
Wait a minute: just 4 answers in the thread concerning the heir of Canon's best-selling lens (excluding kit) and >30 answers about the 1200mm @ 180.000 $?
Maybe I have to move to a less aristocratic forum. :-[ :-[ :-[
Back to topic: if I was tired of waiting for a 50mm (presumably without IS) F/1.8, would it be a good idea to buy an (used) 50mm F/1.4 which is considered good from F/2.0 on? What do Canonrumors' popular masses think?
I think that lenses like the Canon 1200mm are like the famous top models ... We talk about them they, and have desires, but we know that are out of our reach.
Speaking of lenses, I had Canon 50mm F1.4 USM, and it was a good lens to be used in F2 or narrower. I waited many years for a Canon 50mm decently sharp when wide open. I gave up waiting and replace my Canon 50mm for Sigma Art, which I love. The Sigma Art is not as sexy as the Zeiss Otus, but Sigma was within my reach.
Desires ...