Okay, so, for vacation photography....
I've got a 6D (which I love), (and a 7D mk2) and am thinking of three lenses for vacay this year.
I've got: 16-35 f/4, Sigma 24-105 Art, and EF 70-200 f/2.8 plus TC 1.4 and 2 iii's.
(I've also got EF 300 f/2.8 ii and 600 ii, but not for vacay).
So, I'm wondering (of those who have tried both, or those with an opinion...)
With the price of the 100-400 now down to $1600 on eBay, for Pacific Coast Highway drive next month, should I get a 100-400 or just use the 70-200 and a TC if I want more reach? One costs money, and the other requires fumbling around with a TC with the risk of dropping something, and wasting time when you are with your college student son for a few days...
Is the improvement in my vacay photos and enjoyment of my day worth the money?
I guess I could put the 24-105 on the 6D and the 70-200 on the 7D2 and rarely change lenses at all, if the 7D2 doesn't drop off IQ too much.
I realize the 70-200 is the better lens from 100-200, and the 100-400 is the better lens from beyond 200.
IN SUMMARY:
If you were a person who used the 70-200 f/2.8 ii and then bought the 100-400 ii, did you like it? Would you do it again?
Thanks
I've got a 6D (which I love), (and a 7D mk2) and am thinking of three lenses for vacay this year.
I've got: 16-35 f/4, Sigma 24-105 Art, and EF 70-200 f/2.8 plus TC 1.4 and 2 iii's.
(I've also got EF 300 f/2.8 ii and 600 ii, but not for vacay).
So, I'm wondering (of those who have tried both, or those with an opinion...)
With the price of the 100-400 now down to $1600 on eBay, for Pacific Coast Highway drive next month, should I get a 100-400 or just use the 70-200 and a TC if I want more reach? One costs money, and the other requires fumbling around with a TC with the risk of dropping something, and wasting time when you are with your college student son for a few days...
Is the improvement in my vacay photos and enjoyment of my day worth the money?
I guess I could put the 24-105 on the 6D and the 70-200 on the 7D2 and rarely change lenses at all, if the 7D2 doesn't drop off IQ too much.
I realize the 70-200 is the better lens from 100-200, and the 100-400 is the better lens from beyond 200.
IN SUMMARY:
If you were a person who used the 70-200 f/2.8 ii and then bought the 100-400 ii, did you like it? Would you do it again?
Thanks