EOS-1D X Mark II to Shoot 14fps? [CR2]

[Loswr]

Really, the 6D is not superior to the 7D but it is FF so it needs to be "better" than 7.

Interesting. So the fact that the 6D has a better sensor than the 7D doesn't automatically mean the 6D is a better camera? I wonder where else that concept might apply? :

 

[tpatana]

Really, the 6D is not superior to the 7D but it is FF so it needs to be "better" than 7.

Interesting. So the fact that the 6D has a better sensor than the 7D doesn't automatically mean the 6D is a better camera? I wonder where else that concept might apply? :

It's how you use it.

 

[Bob Howland]

I'd be more impressed with 24 full frame images per second, even at 18MP, but I don't think Canon can do that with a mirror flopping around. It's time for Canon to show the world what a professional mirrorless camera should be.

 

[scottkinfw]

I would add to your wish list, faster and more accurate focusing system for wildlife and sports, and this would be a real dream camera that would be hard to pass by (by me).

From my perspective, ultimately what I want is a camera that I can use to capture the best quality images.

To my way of thinking that means good low light performance, good dynamic range, and sensor resolution that can take advantage of the Canon lenses I've got.

Everything else would be gumph.

High frames per second would be nice for situations where the subject is moving quickly, but not necessary for most circumstances.

Canon's camera ergonomics are already excellent.

The ability to access quickly used settings is already excellent.

So, as I see it, it's all about the sensor:
DR
High ISO image quality
Resolution to take more advantage of Canon glass

Meaningful improvements to those 3 key capabilities would see me letting the moths out of my wallet, and see the 5D once again the high tide mark for camera excellence.

By "meaningful" I mean a combination of improvements that results in an overall improvement in resulting image quality. I'm happy to leave the specifics of doing that to the experts in Canon and look forward to seeing the results.

 

[Proscribo]

I'd be more impressed with 24 full frame images per second, even at 18MP, but I don't think Canon can do that with a mirror flopping around. It's time for Canon to show the world what a professional mirrorless camera should be.

Too bad a sports camera badly needs working and fast AF (ie. large AF sensors).

 

[applecider]

With regard to naming the 6 D successor, or any other new dslr build it first then worry about the name.

Really there are a ton of potential names 6D mii , plus, s, sr, etc. most who will buy one of the FF cameras will have some idea of what they are getting.

 

[siegsAR]

Interesting. So the fact that the 6D has a better sensor than the 7D doesn't automatically mean the 6D is a better camera? I wonder where else that concept might apply? :

Nowhere! It only applies to Canon.

 

[unfocused]

They've marketed their FF cameras as being "higher up" than crop.

Really, the 6D is not superior to the 7D but it is FF so it needs to be "better" than 7.

Please provide some examples of Canon marketing materials where they are saying the 6D is "better" than the 7D.

 

[davidmurray]

I'd be more impressed with 24 full frame images per second, even at 18MP, but I don't think Canon can do that with a mirror flopping around. It's time for Canon to show the world what a professional mirrorless camera should be.

Surely if you want a 24fps camera you'd go for a Motion Picture camera rather than for a stills camera.

 

[saveyourmoment]

All i'am asking for is a superior image quality 24MP 30fps "1DX ML". A groundbreaking Fullframe mirrorless 1DX, imagequality state of the art, flashsync 1/8000s and state of the art AF, USB3 and highspeed Wifi options (let the 1dx operate like an ftp-server!). 4K? why not... ergonomics? canons ergonomics are great,don't change them, there is something about the size/weight/balance of a 1dx, that is really nice.
8)

 

[sanj]

Really, the 6D is not superior to the 7D but it is FF so it needs to be "better" than 7.

Interesting. So the fact that the 6D has a better sensor than the 7D doesn't automatically mean the 6D is a better camera? I wonder where else that concept might apply? :

 

[romanr74]

Really, the 6D is not superior to the 7D but it is FF so it needs to be "better" than 7.

Interesting. So the fact that the 6D has a better sensor than the 7D doesn't automatically mean the 6D is a better camera? I wonder where else that concept might apply? :

I just jizzed in my pants...

 

[melbournite]

If they bump the 5DIV sensor up above 24mp and sacrifice low-light performance, they won't be selling me another 5D. I simply have to have the high ISO performance. Fortunately, I suspect there are a lot of others in my position (photojournalists, wedding shooters, event shooters, etc.) so I don't seem them changing the winning formula.

A 7DII-like autofocus, an extra frame or two in frame rate, dual-pixel autofocus and call it a day. Nice add-ons would be touch screen; usable wi-fi; GPS, 4K.

I think you're idea of keeping both lines using the same sensor makes a lot of sense and 24mp is a nice size.

May I dare add to your 'nice add-ons' for the next 5D... an articulated screen?

I don't think your requests are out of line, I'd be lining up for a pre-order.

 

[romanr74]

If they bump the 5DIV sensor up above 24mp and sacrifice low-light performance, they won't be selling me another 5D. I simply have to have the high ISO performance. Fortunately, I suspect there are a lot of others in my position (photojournalists, wedding shooters, event shooters, etc.) so I don't seem them changing the winning formula.

A 7DII-like autofocus, an extra frame or two in frame rate, dual-pixel autofocus and call it a day. Nice add-ons would be touch screen; usable wi-fi; GPS, 4K.

I think you're idea of keeping both lines using the same sensor makes a lot of sense and 24mp is a nice size.

May I dare add to your 'nice add-ons' for the next 5D... an articulated screen?

I don't think your requests are out of line, I'd be lining up for a pre-order.

If they add an articulated screen I'm out (but that discussion was dealt with in an other trail)...

 

[Loswr]

For the longest time, Canon's branding has been such that the smaller the number, the better the camera.

Which is better, 750D or 70D? 1000D or 750D? 5DIII or 1DX? 6D or 5DIII? 7DII or 70D?

Which is better, 100D or 700D?

 

[Andyx01]

So much focus on the 'sensor'.

Low noise PSU, Digic Data Rates, shutter design, AF system, and dozens of other features are going to affect what makes a 1 series body.

It is irrational to presume the same sensor in a lesser body is going to magically put it on par in terms of performance.

Wake me up when the sensor is back illuminated. Until then focus on the features.

 

[TexPhoto]

For the longest time, Canon's branding has been such that the smaller the number, the better the camera.

Which is better, 750D or 70D? 1000D or 750D? 5DIII or 1DX? 6D or 5DIII? 7DII or 70D?

Which is better, 100D or 700D?

Which is harder to say out loud and not giggle 70D, or Kiss X?

 

[expatinasia]

For the longest time, Canon's branding has been such that the smaller the number, the better the camera.

Which is better, 750D or 70D? 1000D or 750D? 5DIII or 1DX? 6D or 5DIII? 7DII or 70D?

Which is better, 100D or 700D?

Which is harder to say out loud and not giggle 70D, or Kiss X?

Isn't Kiss X a radio station?!

Just kidding. Of course the 1D X Mark II will have (at least 14fps), it does that already with the mirror locked up.

I think we can expect far greater things from the 1D X Mark II than these poor rumours.