keithfullermusic said:The Digic 6 has a 6 after it, and the Digic 7 has a 7 after it. 7 is bigger than 6, so it means that it's better and 6 is now worthless.
Ok, this made me laugh out loud . . . ;D
Upvote
0
keithfullermusic said:The Digic 6 has a 6 after it, and the Digic 7 has a 7 after it. 7 is bigger than 6, so it means that it's better and 6 is now worthless.
rfdesigner said:Sorry for sounding dim, but on this side of the pond "Euro" is the stuff they use for money on the continent.
When it comes to sports there's any amount of "euro" competitions.. which one are we referring to?
meywd said:rfdesigner said:Sorry for sounding dim, but on this side of the pond "Euro" is the stuff they use for money on the continent.
When it comes to sports there's any amount of "euro" competitions.. which one are we referring to?
mostly football
cayenne said:Ok...I know what an "Olympic Year" is.
What exactly is an "Euro Year"? Never heard that term before....
meywd said:cayenne said:Ok...I know what an "Olympic Year" is.
What exactly is an "Euro Year"? Never heard that term before....
... and also every four years is a euro year,...
neuroanatomist said:dilbert said:Well...
If the 5D4 is DIGIC 6 then it won't do 4k.
If the 5D4 is DIGIC 7 then there is a chance it will do 4k. But if it doesn't do 4k and has DIGIC 7 then no Canon DSLR will do 4K until DIGIC 8 arrives.
I see. So...the EOS 1D C, with dual Digic 5+ and 4K video capture is...not made by Canon? ...not a dSLR? Or is dilbert just flat out wrong...again?
:![]()
applecider said:Why should we care if a camera has digit 4, 5 , 6, or 7?
I am no expert but generally as microprocessors advance the process lithography is smaller which has several consequences.
Firstly silicon wafers have a defined surface area, so the more processors one can get on a wafer the cheaper the end product. That's nice even if it doesn't mean we'll see lower prices.
But smaller chips (smaller because the process is smaller even though more circuitry is more involved) require less power so the potential for longer battery life is there.
Smaller process can yield faster clock speed cpu's at the same wattage
so more stuff can be done and of course the more processing that can be done while images are being captured the better the image can be. Higher iso images tend to have larger file sizes than the same image at a lower iso, so higher iso imaging becomes possible, and lag times writing could go down.
So I'd say that that all other things being equal I'd want a camera with the latest digic. I'm waiting for the time when photoshop runs on camera......
neuroanatomist said:dilbert said:Well...
If the 5D4 is DIGIC 6 then it won't do 4k.
If the 5D4 is DIGIC 7 then there is a chance it will do 4k. But if it doesn't do 4k and has DIGIC 7 then no Canon DSLR will do 4K until DIGIC 8 arrives.
I see. So...the EOS 1D C, with dual Digic 5+ and 4K video capture is...not made by Canon? ...not a dSLR? Or is dilbert just flat out wrong...again?
:![]()
Lee Jay said:You wouldn't believe my top requests for this model:
- Dual pixel focusing
- Sensor performance per unit area similar to 7DII
- Pop up flash (no, I'm not kidding)
- Under $2,000 (sorry, just trying to see how many of you I could get spew beverage onto the monitor)
Two nice to haves but not that important are:
- 4k video
- Lower base ISO read noise
Tugela said:Hardware encoding in Digic 6 is limited to H.264 1080p60 maximum. That series of processors uses mp4 files at 35 mbps as its native format. To do anything better you need to do it in software, which is why more advanced Canon cameras often use two or more processors. They have to otherwise the processors could not handle the computing demands. Whenever you see dual (or more) processors in a camera the reason is that the tech available to the engineers is not up to the task. Those cameras probably have additional dedicated hardware included as well to assist in that, so it is technically an inefficient solution to the engineering problem. To shoot 4K efficiently with a single processor you will need a Digic 7/Digic DV5 processor. The DV5 is already here, so it is reasonable to presume that the corresponding Digic 7 won't be far off.
IMO 4K footage won't appear in Canon consumer cameras until the Digic 7 processors are included, so if the 5D4 comes with something like dual Digic 6 processors it is going to be crippled from the get go. It would be a camera built for the past, not for the future. Given the option of using dual Digic 6 processors or waiting a bit longer to use Digic 7 processors, the smart thing for Canon to do is wait. Otherwise they will have locked one of their flagship products for the next few years into obsolete tech, much like they did unwisely with the 7D2.
Pop up flash (no, I'm not kidding)
vscd said:The 5D3 already has Dual Card Slots.
Pop up flash (no, I'm not kidding)
Nooo! Please not. No one really need a popup flash with a lousy Light directly on the cam... but maybe a build-in radio trigger coold satisfy a lot of people. I would like to see some new engineered stuff on the Viewfinder. Damn, the time is right to make a hybrid optical Viewer with elektronic information on it. Make a Zebra, a global shutter and get rid of that picture bridge.
Take back the A-Dep function and maybe the Eyecontrolled focus... and for the DR Freaks, make +2EV more Range![]()
vscd said:The 5D3 already has Dual Card Slots.
Pop up flash (no, I'm not kidding)
Nooo! Please not. No one really need a popup flash with a lousy Light directly on the cam...
RGF said:Dylan777 said:Feel like a kid in the candy shop every 4-5yrs ;D
1Dx II
1Dx II
1DX II
but there are several new counters of goodies
1DX II is on one side of the aisle
5DS/5DSR and 5D IV on the other.
Which to choice? Can I have get an advance on next year's allowance?
IgotGASbadDude said:Dylan777 said:Feel like a kid in the candy shop every 4-5yrs ;D 1DX II
I think I need to begin saving for (my guess) an $8K investment . . .![]()