Filters

  • Thread starter Thread starter nairfotografia
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
rahkshi007 said:
Hi, i would like to ask what is the different between B+W F-Pro and B+W XS-Pro.
i only know that XS-PRO has tinner frame. Are Both have the same image quality and both has coating which easy to clean ?

F-Pro vs. XS-Pro refers only to the mount. F-Pro is 5mm thick (except CPL), XS-Pro is 3.4mm thick. The coating is identified by the designation of MRC (multi-resistant coating), Nano (MRC with slightly greater light transmission), or the lack of such a designation (which means single coated or uncoated).
 
Upvote 0
neuroanatomist said:
rahkshi007 said:
Hi, i would like to ask what is the different between B+W F-Pro and B+W XS-Pro.
i only know that XS-PRO has tinner frame. Are Both have the same image quality and both has coating which easy to clean ?

F-Pro vs. XS-Pro refers only to the mount. F-Pro is 5mm thick (except CPL), XS-Pro is 3.4mm thick. The coating is identified by the designation of MRC (multi-resistant coating), Nano (MRC with slightly greater light transmission), or the lack of such a designation (which means single coated or uncoated).

The XS-Pros might be nanocoated by default.
 
Upvote 0
Random Orbits said:
neuroanatomist said:
rahkshi007 said:
Hi, i would like to ask what is the different between B+W F-Pro and B+W XS-Pro.
i only know that XS-PRO has tinner frame. Are Both have the same image quality and both has coating which easy to clean ?

F-Pro vs. XS-Pro refers only to the mount. F-Pro is 5mm thick (except CPL), XS-Pro is 3.4mm thick. The coating is identified by the designation of MRC (multi-resistant coating), Nano (MRC with slightly greater light transmission), or the lack of such a designation (which means single coated or uncoated).

The XS-Pros might be nanocoated by default.

I think so, Nano isn't an option and only comes with XS-Pro filters.
 
Upvote 0
Razor2012 said:
Random Orbits said:
neuroanatomist said:
rahkshi007 said:
Hi, i would like to ask what is the different between B+W F-Pro and B+W XS-Pro.
i only know that XS-PRO has tinner frame. Are Both have the same image quality and both has coating which easy to clean ?

F-Pro vs. XS-Pro refers only to the mount. F-Pro is 5mm thick (except CPL), XS-Pro is 3.4mm thick. The coating is identified by the designation of MRC (multi-resistant coating), Nano (MRC with slightly greater light transmission), or the lack of such a designation (which means single coated or uncoated).

The XS-Pros might be nanocoated by default.

I think so, Nano isn't an option and only comes with XS-Pro filters.

Some store still have plenty of older xs-pro without nano coating. They are slightly cheaper and packed in older light blue box. The newer ones would be black box.
 
Upvote 0
Vonbon said:
Razor2012 said:
Random Orbits said:
neuroanatomist said:
rahkshi007 said:
Hi, i would like to ask what is the different between B+W F-Pro and B+W XS-Pro.
i only know that XS-PRO has tinner frame. Are Both have the same image quality and both has coating which easy to clean ?

F-Pro vs. XS-Pro refers only to the mount. F-Pro is 5mm thick (except CPL), XS-Pro is 3.4mm thick. The coating is identified by the designation of MRC (multi-resistant coating), Nano (MRC with slightly greater light transmission), or the lack of such a designation (which means single coated or uncoated).

The XS-Pros might be nanocoated by default.

I think so, Nano isn't an option and only comes with XS-Pro filters.

Some store still have plenty of older xs-pro without nano coating. They are slightly cheaper and packed in older light blue box. The newer ones would be black box.

Oh ok, I've just seen the newer black boxes.
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.