another thought have you considered the sigma 120-300 f2.8 OS? the previous non S version is quite cheap now and still amazing optically. much more budget friendly than the canon 300 2.8.
Upvote
0
The 5D2 is at least a stop better than the 60D, and the 5D3 is supposed to be about a stop better than the 5D2...Chisox2335 said:Lloyd said:I don’t know your level of experience. I am an amateur and have zero experience in Africa. There are many here who can take a picture of the instant a bullet strikes a balloon using a pinhole box camera. I am not one of them. Therefore, take my thoughts with that in mind.
When I had only my 60D and went to Yellowstone I came back disappointed with many of my low light photos. When I used my old manual focus no IS 800mm I felt I had to keep the shutter speed up and, fearing noise, I kept the iso down as low as I could. I shot in raw and I had a lot of noise in the shadows. In retrospect, I might have been better off raising the iso more and exposing more to the right. Since getting the 5Diii, I have much better results in the low light. I believe that most of this is due to the superiority of the 5Diii and some is due to just gaining more experience. My vote would be for you to get the 5Diii for its low light abilities, provided you have enough time prior to the trip to get familiar with its characteristics.
Have a great trip and don’t get so caught up in the photography that it detracts from what will likely be some moments of a lifetime.
I'm similar Lloyd. I have used my 60d at a couple hockey games with average low light success. I would expect much improvement from a 5d mkiii vs the 60d.
You sound like you've been talking to my fiancé with that last comment![]()
wickidwombat said:another thought have you considered the sigma 120-300 f2.8 OS? the previous non S version is quite cheap now and still amazing optically. much more budget friendly than the canon 300 2.8.
philmoz said:Not directly related to the OP's original question; but if you're travelling in open vehicles then a bean bag may be useful.
I used one of these in Africa in 2012 and it helped me a lot - http://thepod.ca/.
Phil.
Chisox2335 said:philmoz said:Not directly related to the OP's original question; but if you're travelling in open vehicles then a bean bag may be useful.
I used one of these in Africa in 2012 and it helped me a lot - http://thepod.ca/.
Phil.
Bean bag is on the list of things to buy. I looked at the pod. You're a fan? What color for the lenses I'm thinking?
philmoz said:Chisox2335 said:philmoz said:Not directly related to the OP's original question; but if you're travelling in open vehicles then a bean bag may be useful.
I used one of these in Africa in 2012 and it helped me a lot - http://thepod.ca/.
Phil.
Bean bag is on the list of things to buy. I looked at the pod. You're a fan? What color for the lenses I'm thinking?
The main advantage over a plain bean bag is the attachment to the camera or lens - it makes it very easy to move around without remembering to pick up the bag all the time.
I used the red one with the 70-300L attached to the lens tripod ring (camera was a 7D).
I've also used it occasionally with the 100-400L.
According to their web site this is not a recommended configuration; but I've had no problems. I got the red one to keep the weight and size down.
Phil.
Chisox2335 said:philmoz said:Chisox2335 said:philmoz said:Not directly related to the OP's original question; but if you're travelling in open vehicles then a bean bag may be useful.
I used one of these in Africa in 2012 and it helped me a lot - http://thepod.ca/.
Phil.
Bean bag is on the list of things to buy. I looked at the pod. You're a fan? What color for the lenses I'm thinking?
The main advantage over a plain bean bag is the attachment to the camera or lens - it makes it very easy to move around without remembering to pick up the bag all the time.
I used the red one with the 70-300L attached to the lens tripod ring (camera was a 7D).
I've also used it occasionally with the 100-400L.
According to their web site this is not a recommended configuration; but I've had no problems. I got the red one to keep the weight and size down.
Phil.
http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/774087-REG
This is the one I had been looking at. Was going to get a ball mount so I could keep quick release plates on my cameras so I could keep them in my bags during the driving to reduce dust
philmoz said:Chisox2335 said:philmoz said:Chisox2335 said:philmoz said:Not directly related to the OP's original question; but if you're travelling in open vehicles then a bean bag may be useful.
I used one of these in Africa in 2012 and it helped me a lot - http://thepod.ca/.
Phil.
Bean bag is on the list of things to buy. I looked at the pod. You're a fan? What color for the lenses I'm thinking?
The main advantage over a plain bean bag is the attachment to the camera or lens - it makes it very easy to move around without remembering to pick up the bag all the time.
I used the red one with the 70-300L attached to the lens tripod ring (camera was a 7D).
I've also used it occasionally with the 100-400L.
According to their web site this is not a recommended configuration; but I've had no problems. I got the red one to keep the weight and size down.
Phil.
http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/774087-REG
This is the one I had been looking at. Was going to get a ball mount so I could keep quick release plates on my cameras so I could keep them in my bags during the driving to reduce dust
If you've got the room, then it looks like a more versatile option than 'the pod'.
Some of the vehicles I was travelling in had fairly high roofs, and since I'm not very tall (167cm), I occasionally had to stretch to get the camera positioned out the top of the vehicle. Adding an extra ball head would not have worked as well for me.
Also, keep in mind if you're travelling with a group, that you may not have much room in the vehicle for your gear.
Phil.
Chisox2335 said:philmoz said:Not directly related to the OP's original question; but if you're travelling in open vehicles then a bean bag may be useful.
I used one of these in Africa in 2012 and it helped me a lot - http://thepod.ca/.
Phil.
Bean bag is on the list of things to buy. I looked at the pod. You're a fan? What color for the lenses I'm thinking?
sanj said:Chisox2335 said:philmoz said:Not directly related to the OP's original question; but if you're travelling in open vehicles then a bean bag may be useful.
I used one of these in Africa in 2012 and it helped me a lot - http://thepod.ca/.
Phil.
Bean bag is on the list of things to buy. I looked at the pod. You're a fan? What color for the lenses I'm thinking?
I never carry a bean bag and clutter up my suitcase. I fold a towel from the hotel and rest my lens on it. No problems.
Vivid Color said:Based on my trip to Tanzania last year, I would recommend getting a beanbag, but I would recommend getting a fairly simple one. Especially, if you do not know right now exactly what type of vehicle you will have or how many people will be in your vehicle. From my experience, sometimes I was shooting sitting down out of a window and sometimes I was standing up shooting out through the pop top. When the vehicle was stopped, I was moving constantly from window level to pop top level. I would not have wanted a heavy beanbag attached to my camera, but that's just me. And if you fill it with beans in Africa, like I did, it can get very heavy. Sometimes you will want to use the beanbag, and it can be a godsend, and sometimes you'll find that it's not very useful at all. Whatever you get, be sure that there is someway to fasten it to the vehicle so you don't lose it. This is the one I bought: http://www.kgear.com/store/r420.html
As for the dust, I will echo what others have said and strongly encourage you to change lenses only in your hotel room.
I can't say enough good things about B+ W's filters with nano coatings. The nano coating literally makes the dust slide off the filter.
I did not take a computer and I am really glad I left it at home. I just kept all the files on the disks and used two think tank card wallets to keep them organized.
One item that hasn't been mentioned, but I highly recommend you bring, is one or more small extension cords--the kind you can plug two or three things into. This greatly facilitates the recharging of all of your electronic devices.
By the way, I took my Canon 6D and T1i. I generally had my 24-105 lens attached to the 6D and my 70-300 L attached to the T1i. I also took a couple of other lenses and a point-and-shoot. During regular daylight hours, the T1i worked beautifully. However, it did not do so well in the very early hours of dawn. I would also say that about 99% of the time, the animals were either sitting fairly still or moving fairly slowly. So I would not worry about a high frame per second rate. As such, the 6D, with its exceptional lowlight capabilities would likely be more than sufficient if you wish to go the full frame route.
watchman48 said:We have been to Zambia, SA and Botswana a number of times on safari and there couple of things that you might need to bear in mind.
If you are travelling between camps using light aircraft there is usually a weight limit on bags. I know that recently Proflight in Zambia introduced a strict weight limit on their internal flights. A couple of bodies plus lenses, battery packs etc. soon build up the weight. worth checking with your travel agent.
I wouldn't bring a tripod, prefer a monopod. If you are sharing a vehicle with up to 6 guests, space is limited and tripods take up a lot of room. I find the monpod easier to use, especially if the jeep, land rover etc. is bouncing around. No tarmac roads I'm afread. A lot of the good lodges will supply bean bags.
If you can avoid changing lenses during the game drive then do so. Apart from the dust aspect it's much easier to have two bodies set up with different lenses so that you can swap at a moments notice. I have the 100-400 and find it only of use in good light and would tend to use my 70-200 f2.8 for the early dawn and dusk shots.
The light drops quite dramatically, especially on the equator.
Chisox2335 said:watchman48 said:We have been to Zambia, SA and Botswana a number of times on safari and there couple of things that you might need to bear in mind.
If you are travelling between camps using light aircraft there is usually a weight limit on bags. I know that recently Proflight in Zambia introduced a strict weight limit on their internal flights. A couple of bodies plus lenses, battery packs etc. soon build up the weight. worth checking with your travel agent.
I wouldn't bring a tripod, prefer a monopod. If you are sharing a vehicle with up to 6 guests, space is limited and tripods take up a lot of room. I find the monpod easier to use, especially if the jeep, land rover etc. is bouncing around. No tarmac roads I'm afread. A lot of the good lodges will supply bean bags.
If you can avoid changing lenses during the game drive then do so. Apart from the dust aspect it's much easier to have two bodies set up with different lenses so that you can swap at a moments notice. I have the 100-400 and find it only of use in good light and would tend to use my 70-200 f2.8 for the early dawn and dusk shots.
The light drops quite dramatically, especially on the equator.
Plan is to use the 70-200 during those times 100-400 in good light as you mentioned. I will be bringing a monopod or bean bag for the truck and a tripod for astro shots. We only take one inter country flight and it's on a decent size sa airways flight. All other transfers are by car.
TrabimanUK said:Chisox2335 said:watchman48 said:We have been to Zambia, SA and Botswana a number of times on safari and there couple of things that you might need to bear in mind.
If you are travelling between camps using light aircraft there is usually a weight limit on bags. I know that recently Proflight in Zambia introduced a strict weight limit on their internal flights. A couple of bodies plus lenses, battery packs etc. soon build up the weight. worth checking with your travel agent.
I wouldn't bring a tripod, prefer a monopod. If you are sharing a vehicle with up to 6 guests, space is limited and tripods take up a lot of room. I find the monpod easier to use, especially if the jeep, land rover etc. is bouncing around. No tarmac roads I'm afread. A lot of the good lodges will supply bean bags.
If you can avoid changing lenses during the game drive then do so. Apart from the dust aspect it's much easier to have two bodies set up with different lenses so that you can swap at a moments notice. I have the 100-400 and find it only of use in good light and would tend to use my 70-200 f2.8 for the early dawn and dusk shots.
The light drops quite dramatically, especially on the equator.
Plan is to use the 70-200 during those times 100-400 in good light as you mentioned. I will be bringing a monopod or bean bag for the truck and a tripod for astro shots. We only take one inter country flight and it's on a decent size sa airways flight. All other transfers are by car.
Be aware that SA ailines have an 8kg hand luggage allowance. It's a bit on the low side and you might have to be clever in your packing. If your wife / girlfriend is going, then load her handbag, as women get the 8kg hand luggage limit PLUS a handbag.