Of course gear matters.... take a 800F5.6, a 600F4, a 500F4, 4002.8, and a 200-400F4.... use the boxes they come in, and you can make a life-raft....insanitybeard said:The gear does matter after all......
Will that support a man + camera gear? That looks like a white lens in the avatar. Are you jumping ship or walking the gang plank. If a big boat called the titanic offers to pick you up, you might want to hold your thumb out a little longer. Is this like a new tv show that grabs your interest by creating a mystery and is then cancelled before the mystery is resolved?Click said:...Just in case...
![]()
![]()
RLPhoto said:So after jumping ship for the weekend and shoot nikon only with a friends equipment, this is what I have to say about nikon.
1. The DR is better, but not as much as I expected.
2. I couldn't stand the ergos, it drove me nuts with the ISO button not being as fast to change as on canon.
3. The AF with primes wasnt as good as my mk3s. Yes, the left AF point on the d800 was slooooow.
4. Flash exposure was very nice, but I missed my RT. :/
5. Overall, it wasnt too bad but I prefer my canon.
I couldn't help but LoL at some of the comments. CR has a sense of humor.
RLPhoto said:So after jumping ship for the weekend and shoot nikon only with a friends equipment, this is what I have to say about nikon.
AcutancePhotography said:RLPhoto said:So after jumping ship for the weekend and shoot nikon only with a friends equipment, this is what I have to say about nikon.
So it is not so much that you jumped ship. Just that now we all know you go both ways. ;D
if your workflow didn't change, you wouldn't notice much differenceRLPhoto said:1. The DR is better, but not as much as I expected.
ergos are individual taste, being used to Canon after so many years I still have a slight pref for how they do some things but Nikon's control placement is more consistent from model to model than Canon's regular randomizing of button positions2. I couldn't stand the ergos, it drove me nuts with the ISO button not being as fast to change as on canon.
depends on the lens, Nik's ultrasonic motors do seem to be slower3. The AF with primes wasnt as good as my mk3s. Yes, the left AF point on the d800 was slooooow.
agreed4. Flash exposure was very nice, but I missed my RT. :/
good on you for at least giving it a try5. Overall, it wasnt too bad but I prefer my canon.
Aglet said:if your workflow didn't change, you wouldn't notice much differenceRLPhoto said:1. The DR is better, but not as much as I expected.
ergos are individual taste, being used to Canon after so many years I still have a slight pref for how they do some things but Nikon's control placement is more consistent from model to model than Canon's regular randomizing of button positions2. I couldn't stand the ergos, it drove me nuts with the ISO button not being as fast to change as on canon.
ISO's actually much faster to adj on d800, if you'd have assigned it to a control wheel
depends on the lens, Nik's ultrasonic motors do seem to be slower3. The AF with primes wasnt as good as my mk3s. Yes, the left AF point on the d800 was slooooow.
my d800s have no left AF weakness
agreed4. Flash exposure was very nice, but I missed my RT. :/
good on you for at least giving it a try5. Overall, it wasnt too bad but I prefer my canon.
If you do so again, you might get more out of the experience.
Maybe try it in more challenging conditions.
RLPhoto said:Aglet said:if your workflow didn't change, you wouldn't notice much differenceRLPhoto said:1. The DR is better, but not as much as I expected.
ergos are individual taste, being used to Canon after so many years I still have a slight pref for how they do some things but Nikon's control placement is more consistent from model to model than Canon's regular randomizing of button positions2. I couldn't stand the ergos, it drove me nuts with the ISO button not being as fast to change as on canon.
ISO's actually much faster to adj on d800, if you'd have assigned it to a control wheel
depends on the lens, Nik's ultrasonic motors do seem to be slower3. The AF with primes wasnt as good as my mk3s. Yes, the left AF point on the d800 was slooooow.
my d800s have no left AF weakness
agreed4. Flash exposure was very nice, but I missed my RT. :/
good on you for at least giving it a try5. Overall, it wasnt too bad but I prefer my canon.
If you do so again, you might get more out of the experience.
Maybe try it in more challenging conditions.
I'll see how the d900 vs 5D4 goes. This generation of systems still weighs heavily in favor for Canon in my uses. As for ship jumping, my buddy quite liked shooting with my canon equipment. He's thinking about jumping ship to canon.![]()
Every time I played with Nikon D3000, D5000, D90 friends, seemed to me that did not fit well in the hand. Canon T2i seemed better ergonomics, although being small. For some mysterious reason, in my city, women prefer Nikon.RAKAMRAK said:So, those of you who have used both systems do you guys feel that Nikon cameras are designed and built keeping a smaller hand size as the target compared to comparable Canon cameras? I used the Nikon cameras of two of my friends (one D80 and the other was probably D90 or D7000) and found the hand grip feeling smaller/thinner than my 40D and 50D....... any opinion?
RAKAMRAK said:So, those of you who have used both systems do you guys feel that Nikon cameras are designed and built keeping a smaller hand size as the target compared to comparable Canon cameras? I used the Nikon cameras of two of my friends (one D80 and the other was probably D90 or D7000) and found the hand grip feeling smaller/thinner than my 40D and 50D....... any opinion?