If you want a 1Ds mk IV....please sign this petition

[etto72]

If you are among those that wish Canon to deliver a high megapixel (40+) DSLR
please sign this petition

http://www.petitionbuzz.com/petitions/canon1dsmkiv

Thanks

Ettore

 

[etto72]

we need signature!

 

[cdang]

Voted no but still signed it for my fellow CR buddies.

 

[DavidRiesenberg]

I voted but if I had to choose, I'd prefer my megapixels in a non 1 body

 

[Axilrod]

I think this petition is incredibly childish and idiotic, I'm sure Canon is well aware of this and probably already have something in the works.

 

[Mt Spokane Photography]

Be sure to send the results of the vote with it!

 

[Loswr]

If you are among those that wish Canon to deliver a high megapixel (40+) DSLR

...then, it seems you are clearly in the small minority, at least in this sample population...

 

[mrmarks]

I'll vote for a 1DXs

 

[Invertalon]

From the poll I guess it is safe to say Canon shooters are perfectly fine with 18-22MP offerings.... Very few require or want 30+ MP sensors at this point.

 

[Razor2012]

Hmmm, was there alot of complaining until the D3X showed up? They had to wait over a year before 24.5mp came along.

 

[etto72]

Those that don't need a high megapixel dslr
don't need to bother....

theothers please go for it

http://www.petitionbuzz.com/petitions/canon1dsmkiv

 

[Ryan708]

canon has some of the sharpest lenses and very few of them outperform 20 megapixel sensors. I would rather have more dynamic rance, and more sensitivity, but sadly megapixel cravers make development go in the wrong direction. give me 18 megapixel with more dynamic range, and crystal clear 12,800 ISO

 

[lexus82su]

Very few people who cannot afford a medium format camera NEED 40+ megapixels. I personally think the 22 in my 5D Mk ii is overkill for about 90% of my work and I print 24x36 portraits.

I am glad to see that near the bottom of this page someone actually pointed out that Canon's glass couldn't resolve a 40+ megapixel image ANYWAY.

I laugh that Nikon has produced a 30+ MP camera because I believe Canon's glass is as good as (if not slightly better than) Nikon's glass and Canon's glass is maxed at about 24-25mp resolving power. Nikon is going to have to update their ENTIRE line of pro lenses to accommodate a 30+ MP sensor.
BA-HAHAHA, Morons who buy a 30+ MP Nikon deserve what they get (which will be quality BARELY better than the current D3x)!!!

 

[etto72]

If you would have had (like i just experienced) the D800E in a portrait studio shooting.....
and looked at the files from both cameras side by side...
.......you would understand why we want more megapixel


I love my 5D mk III, but in that contest the D800 was clearly superior :'(

 

[Loswr]

theothers please go for it

When the 5DIII launched, there were over 1800 people on this site in that 1-day period. The petition you link has been up for a day and now has a whopping 35 signatures. If Canon even becomes aware the effort, such a lackluster response might not exactly send the message you're hoping for... :

 

[briansquibb]

I have a 1DS3 and find that 21mp is very good.

I would upgrade my 1D4 with a 1D5 with 22mp and 1.3 crop. I might not worry about the f/8 focussing at that point either

 

[etto72]

Now is 51!

Those that believe in this please sign
http://www.petitionbuzz.com/petitions/canon1dsmkiv

Thanks

 

[etto72]

73

 

[Loswr]

Wow, that's a lot of people. Let's round it up to an even 100. With that many interested customers, to defray the R&D costs, Canon will only have to charge about $78,000 per camera.

 

[briansquibb]

Wow, that's a lot of people. Let's round it up to an even 100. With that many interested customers, to defray the R&D costs, Canon will only have to charge about $78,000 per camera.

To maintain my position as the top, rich, talentless amateur I would be up for 2 at that price