Thanks.
I just balk at the notion that AP's choice of camera brand is suddenly something of significance and importance, when as far as I can tell it hasn't been of any real concern to anyone (apart from AP's own photographers, presumably), up to this point.
"It matters because it's Sony..." doesn't sit well with me.
Cheer up! The force is strong with Canon.I'm a known pessimist, just hoping this isnt the beginning of a dark time for Canon. But if it is, they already have 2x F1.2 lenses and very competitive high ISO performance to find their way through it.![]()
Good post Keith. My RF50 just arrived, I got a deal on a brand new one.[..]heavy, majestic beast (holy crap its big) [..]
I'd happen to disagree on this point.I'll bet that nobody ever bought into a camera system simply because they saw it being used at a sporting event on TV..!
If you think the RF50 is big, I recommend renting the RF85/1.2, it makes the 50 feel small, light and soft![]()
There is little likelihood of receiving one before they are shipped. B&H says shipping begins on 30 July.Moving on has anyone heard about their R5's or R6's being delivered yet .
Good article. I stand by my earlier comment that while this is not a big deal financially (a couple hundred photographers according to AP), it is a great marketing opportunity for Sony if they take advantage of it and I'm sure they will. In the midst of a shrinking market, the professional space is now clearly occupied by three brands instead of two. What that will mean is anyone's guess. It could spur all three to innovate and market more aggressively to avoid losing market share and try to gain against their competitors. But it could also mean fewer resources available for product development.