The benefit would be paying a lot less money - perhaps 1/2 as much. What a surprising number of people on this forum don't seem to understand or realize is that many folks can not afford an R5.I agree that the 45MP of the R5 is a nice sweet spot for a FF camera (and it's a very good sensor). The point I was trying to make is that in order for the "R7" to have appeal to wildlife photographers, it needs to offer *more* resolution than a cropped R5 can produce. Otherwise, what would be the benefit of getting the "R7"?
Upvote
0